Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Michael T McCormick Jr Memorial Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$139kRecreation & Sports$15kReligion$2kPhilanthropy$985Health$105
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$939
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SETON HALL PREP$4,500
VARIOUS ORGANIZTIONSINDIVIDUALS$285
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 45% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $105 → 17%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $60k → 8%SETON HALL PREP: $14k → 16%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%WEST ORGANGE POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $13k → 16%SETON HALL PREP: $5k → 16%SETON HALL PREP: $4k → 16%SETON HALL PREP: $4k → 16%SETON HALL PREP: $4k → 16%SETON HALL PREP: $2k → 16%WEST ORANGE POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $2k → 16%SETON HALL PREP: $2k → 16%VARIOUS INDIVIDUALS: $1k → 16%SETON HALL PREP: $1k → 16%THE SHILLELAGH CLUB FRIENDLY SONS OF THE SHILLELAGH: $915 → 16%THE SHILLELAGH CLUB FRIENDLY SONS OF THE SHILLELAGH: $760 → 16%VARIOUS INDIVIDUALS: $550 → 16%TONY ESPOSITO JR FOUNDATION: $500 → 16%VARIOUS INDIVIDUALS: $500 → 16%VARIOUS ORGANIZTIONSINDIVIDUALS: $500 → 16%SETON HALL PREP: $300 → 16%VARIOUS ORGANIZTIONSINDIVIDUALS: $285 → 16%THE BRENDAN P TEVLIN MEMORIAL FUND: $200 → 16%THE SHILLELAGH CLUB FRIENDLY SONS OF THE SHILLELAGH: $125 → 16%WEST ORANGE MOUNTAINEERS CHEER: $50 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$141k · 5 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$141k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-14%
+59%

Still filing today

20%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $70k · revenue -14%
  • SH
    SETON HALL PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $36k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    7× · 2017–2023 · $33k

Funded once

  • WO
    WEST ORGANGE POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE
    one grant, 2018 · $13k
  • WO
    WEST ORANGE POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • TE
    TONY ESPOSITO JR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue -85%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
1/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SETON HALL PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $35,950 · OtherSETON HALL PREPARATORY SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $32,565 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWEST ORGANGE POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE: $13,364 · OtherWEST ORGANGE POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE+5 more: $4,835 · Other+5 moreRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $70,000 · EducationRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION+1 more: $500 · EducationBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $105 · Health
Other$86,714Education$70,500Health$105

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTONY ESPOSITO JR FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TONY ESPOSITO JR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Michael T McCormick Jr Memorial Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Michael T McCormick Jr Memorial Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Michael T McCormick Jr Memorial Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Michael T McCormick Jr Memorial Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Michael T McCormick Jr Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph