Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Michael and Samantha Harary Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$185k
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$555kHealth$126kArts & Culture$123kEducation$84kFood & Nutrition$80kYouth Development$79kCommunity Improvement$56kHuman Services$36kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k26 grants · $72k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $58k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$2,600
Median grant
4
States reached
$142k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAFE$55,426
DSN COMMUNITY$25,000
RAMAZ SCHOOL$18,000
COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK$15,000
YAD DAVID$7,200
Yeshivat Torat Yosef$6,000
Sephardic Food Fund$6,000
Maskeel El Dal Society$5,200
Shore Area Mikvah$5,200
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SIMHA ORGANIZATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,320
Individual grant recipient$2,600
ALBERT MISSRY FOUNDATION$2,600
HATZALAH EMS OF JERSEY SHORE$2,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ISRAEL MEDICAL FUND: $3k → 17%BONEI OLAM: $10k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $5k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $5k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $5k → 20%Misaskim: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 53 repeat orgs$365k to everyone else

53 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
40

Total granted

$1.0M
$272k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+83%

Still filing today

34%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    DEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $79k · revenue +116%
  • TS
    THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $76k · revenue +65%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $75k · revenue +234%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $75k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $51k
  • TS
    THE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Congregation Beth-El Sephardic Center of Jamaica Estates

Congregation beth-el sephardic center of jamaica estates is a religious institution

Religion
5
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
6
Bet Midrash Ohel Torah

Operation of a post-secondary educational institution providing rabbinical training with a focus on sephardic/middle eastern jewish tradition.

Education
7
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
8
Yad Yosef Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Yeshivat Leluv of Jerusalem Inc

Charitable work to help people in need

—
10
Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy
11
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
12
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pef Israel Endowment Funds Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ilan High School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
26/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $79,879 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $61,800 · OtherISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INCSAFE: $55,426 · OtherSAFERAMAZ SCHOOL: $54,000 · OtherRAMAZ SCHOOLTHE EDMOND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE INC: $51,002 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $51,001 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $44,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $39,621 · OtherMAAYNEI HAYESHVA TRUST YAD DAVID: $36,000 · Other+73 more: $447,760 · Other+73 moreDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $78,582 · Youth DevelopmentSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $28,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $76,288 · Food & NutritionSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $13,000 · Food & NutritionTHE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC: $12,600 · EducationILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $11,400 · EducationYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $7,200 · EducationYESHIVAT TORAT YOSEF INC: $6,000 · Education+1 more: $201 · EducationUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $20,400 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $8,500 · PhilanthropyLEV ECHAD INC: $3,600 · PhilanthropyALBERT MISSRY FOUNDATION: $2,600 · PhilanthropyTORAT CHESED TRUST: $1,800 · PhilanthropyYAD DAVID INC: $26,600 · InternationalFUND FOR ISRAEL'S TOMORROW: $5,000 · InternationalTOV VACHESED INC: $2,800 · International
Other$995,589Youth Development$106,582Arts & Culture$105,000Food & Nutrition$89,288Education$37,401Philanthropy$36,900International$34,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $78,582 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $76,288 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $61,800 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMASKEEL EL DAL SOCIETY: $31,200 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $28,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYAD DAVID INC: $26,600 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $25,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $20,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION MAGEN DAVID OF MANHATTAN: $14,360 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC: $12,600 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $12,003 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $11,400 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUpper East Side Hatzolah Inc: $10,200 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetEXCEED NETWORK: $10,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $8,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $7,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAT TORAT YOSEF INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFUND FOR ISRAEL'S TOMORROW: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEV ECHAD INC: $3,600 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTOV VACHESED INC: $2,800 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetISRAEL MEDICAL FUND CORP: $2,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALBERT MISSRY FOUNDATION: $2,600 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBET YAAKOV OZ VEHADAR INC: $201 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MASKEEL EL DAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YAD DAVID INC ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION MAGEN DAVID OF MANHATTAN ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247 ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds ILAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Upper East Side Hatzolah Inc ↗
  • Who funds EXCEED NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY47.5× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Cabasso Family Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Victor Azrak & Sons Family Foundation Inc · Joseph Jack Sitt 1986 - Charitable Trust · Albert & Melissa Sutton Foundation · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Michael and Samantha Harary Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Michael and Samantha Harary Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Michael and Samantha Harary Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Michael and Samantha Harary Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Michael and Samantha Harary Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph