Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Micah-6-8 Blessings Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$47k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Religion$800kCommunity Improvement$240kAnimals$47kEnvironment$30kRecreation & Sports$25kFood & Nutrition$24kInternational$14kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $67k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$6.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SILVER LININGS MINISTRIES$46,575
THE ALLIANCE$20,000
LONG ISLAND CARES INC$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
COVENANT HOUSE NY$2,500
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $5k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $5k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $5k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $3k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $2k → 7%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $2k → 7%LONG ISLAND CARES INC: $2k → 7%COVENANT HOUSE NY: $3k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE NY: $3k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE NY: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$989k · 9 repeat orgs$208k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +141% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$989k
$162k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+141%
+29%

Still filing today

44%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsAnimalsEnvironmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LI
    Long Island Cares Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $24k · revenue +141%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE
    5× · 2018–2024 · $8k · revenue +11%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $7k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • LI
    LONG ISLAND ALLIANCE CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • CF
    CCA FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +511%
  • CC
    CAMP COMANCHE INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -75%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
3
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
4
Childfund International Usa

Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…

International
5
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
6
Feeding Hungry Children International

Provide food, shelter, and medical assistance for children around the world.

7
International Committee of the Red Cross

The international committee of the red cross (switzerland)(icrc) is an impartial, neutral, and independent organization whose exclusively humanitarian mission is to protect the lives and dignity of victims of armed conflict and of violence…

International
8
Mary's Meals Usa Inc

To raise donations to (i) provide a daily meal in a place of education for children in the world's poorest communities; (ii) occasionally provide relief for those suffering, in any part of the world, as a result of humanitarian crises…

International
9
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
10
Childlife Foundation America I

To provide critical medical services and treatment free for infants & children regardless of race and religion

Philanthropy
11
Island Harvest Ltd

The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.

Human Services
12
Amani Global Works

Amani Global Works ("Amani") was formed to develop and implement a comprehensive, inclusive and sustainable model for the provision of healthcare and related services to underserved rural communities in Africa. Amanis mission is to save…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Silver Lining Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

US CHINESE CHURCHES ASSOCIATION — $550,000 · OtherUS CHINESE CHURCHES ASSOCIATIONTHEALLIANCE — $195,000 · OtherTHEALLIANCECHINESE ALLIANCE CENTER OF THE C&MA — $150,000 · OtherCHINESE ALLIANCE CENTER OF THE C&MALONG ISLAND ALLIANCE CHURCH — $100,000 · OtherLONG ISLAND ALLIANCE CHURCHTHE ALLIANCE — $45,000 · Other+3 more — $5,000 · OtherSILVER LINING MINISTRIES — $46,575 · AnimalsLong Island Cares Inc — $23,725 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE — $8,000 · Human ServicesCCA FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · EnvironmentCAMP COMANCHE INCORPORATED — $25,000 · Recreation & SportsMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $7,000 · InternationalMercy Ships International — $7,000 · InternationalST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $5,000 · Health
Other$1,045,000Animals$46,575Human Services$31,725Environment$30,000Recreation & Sports$25,000International$14,000Health$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCCA FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetCAMP COMANCHE INCORPORATED — $25,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetLong Island Cares Inc — $23,725 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International — $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SILVER LINING MINISTRIES
  • Who funds CCA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CAMP COMANCHE INCORPORATED
  • Who funds Long Island Cares Inc
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Micah-6-8 Blessings Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph