Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mg Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2023.

Religion$430kHuman Services$30kCommunity Improvement$26kHealth$11kFood & Nutrition$10kEducation$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k7 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $37k
$2,200
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF DARCHEI HILLEL INC$36,600
EZRAT ISRAEL$6,301
HATZALAH EMS OF THE JERSEY SHORE$2,600
CONGREGATION KOLLEL HECHAL HATORAH$2,200
NETIVEI OHR YAAKOV INC$1,200
SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM$1,000
OHR MENACHEM$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $11k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$266k · 7 repeat orgs$280k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
27

Total granted

$266k
$279k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+6%

Still filing today

29%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
EducationReligionFood & NutritionPhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF DARCHEI HILLEL INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $180k · revenue +18%
  • EI
    EZRAT ISRAEL INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $29k
  • NO
    NETIVEY OHR YAAKOV INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $18k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • CB
    CONGREGATION BENEI LEVY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $61k
  • CS
    CONGREGATION SHAARE ZION
    one grant, 2022 · $57k
  • Y
    YDE
    one grant, 2022 · $26k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
3
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
4
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
5
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
6
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
7
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
8
Yeshiva Kol Torah Inc

Education

Education
9
Yeshiva Derech Hatorah-Yeshivat Mizrachi Lbanim

A school-section 170(b)(1)(a)(ii), operating from the preschool pre-k level through high school, and chartered ny the new york state education department and board of regents.

Education
10
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
11
Friends of Yeshiva Tehilas Shlomo Inc

Provide support to further jewish education

Philanthropy
12
Yeshiva Yesodei Hachaim

To provide secondary high school education in Brooklyn, NY

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Ohel Torah; the most unlike its peers is Ilan High School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION BENEI LEVY INC: $61,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BENEI LEVY INCCONGREGATION SHAARE ZION: $57,000 · OtherCONGREGATION SHAARE ZIONEZRAT ISRAEL INC: $28,521 · OtherEZRAT ISRAEL INCYDE: $25,501 · OtherYDECONGREGATION KOLLEL HECHAL HATORAH INC: $17,600 · OtherCONGREGATION KOLLEL HECHAL HATORAH INCCONGREGATION ZICHRONE BINYAMIN: $13,000 · OtherPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $10,000 · Other+17 more: $65,978 · Other+17 moreFRIENDS OF DARCHEI HILLEL INC: $179,800 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF DARCHEI HILLEL INCYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $20,000 · ReligionTHE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC: $2,095 · ReligionTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $10,000 · Food & NutritionNETIVEY OHR YAAKOV INC: $18,200 · InternationalILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $5,000 · EducationBET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH: $5,000 · EducationBET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $4,801 · EducationYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $1,200 · EducationSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $11,600 · Human Services
Other$278,600Philanthropy$179,800Religion$22,095Food & Nutrition$20,000International$18,200Education$16,001Human Services$11,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF DARCHEI HILLEL INC: $179,800 over 2y, 12% of budgetYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNETIVEY OHR YAAKOV INC: $18,200 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $11,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE RECORDED TALMUD: $5,200 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $4,801 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC: $2,095 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF DARCHEI HILLEL INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT OHEL TORAH ↗
  • Who funds NETIVEY OHR YAAKOV INC ↗
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247 ↗
  • Who funds PEYLIM LEV LACHIM ↗
  • Who funds THE RECORDED TALMUD ↗
  • Who funds ILAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH ↗
  • Who funds BET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA KETER TORAH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY35.3× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Cabasso Family Foundation · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · Ic Hessed Foundation · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · E R G Foundation · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Setton Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mg Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mg Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Bet Yaakov of the Jersey Shore Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Mg Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Mg Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mg Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph