Skip to content

California · Private foundation

The Meta & George Rosenberg Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$320k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
8
Grants FY2025
7
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$74,625
Organizations funded a year
7 to 10
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$2.7M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations The Meta & George Rosenberg Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving8$320k13%
FY20247$295k0%
FY20237$230k0%
FY20227$215k0%
FY20217$210k0%
FY20207$200k14%
FY20199$180k0%
FY201810$237k20%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$567kHealth$278kSocial Science$225kHousing & Shelter$175kFood & Nutrition$150kAnimals$130kArts & Culture$93kHuman Services$93k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Plus 4 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.3M), not named here.

Compare The Meta & George Rosenberg Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Meta & George Rosenberg Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Meta & George Rosenberg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Meta & George Rosenberg Foundation

How much does The Meta & George Rosenberg Foundation give?
The Meta & George Rosenberg Foundation reported 8 grants totaling $319,625 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 10 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does The Meta & George Rosenberg Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (33%), Health (16%), Social Science (13%).
Who are The Meta & George Rosenberg Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Hollenbeck Palms ($225k), Los Angeles Regional Food Bank ($200k), Canine Companions for Independence Inc ($145k).
Does The Meta & George Rosenberg Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Meta & George Rosenberg Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Where is The Meta & George Rosenberg Foundation based?
The Meta & George Rosenberg Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Meta & George Rosenberg’s filings →

More from the funding graph