Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Merops Foundation 6178-01-16

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$604k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$160k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Science & Tech$1.1MEducation$767kArts & Culture$347kHealth$333kReligion$101kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $259k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $340k
$33,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$9.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Research Institute in Turkey$160,000
Koc Education Culture and Healthcare$70,000
University of Michigan$60,000
University of Michigan$50,000
Board of Regents of the University of$45,000
University of Central Florida Foundation$42,500
University of Chicago$37,235
University of Pennsylvania Museum$33,000
The University of Kansas Center for$25,850
Institute of Nautical Archaeology$20,000
University of California Berkeley$20,000
ARTogether$15,000
American Research Institute in Turkey$10,000
University of Chicago$10,000
University of Arizona Foundation$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%University of Arizona Foundation: $10k → 15%SEE ATTACHED: $474k → 22%ARTogether: $15k → 10%Koc Education Culture and Healthcare: $70k → 17%University of Central Florida Foundation: $43k → 13%The Regents of the University of: $120k → 14%The University of Kansas Center for: $26k → 15%University of Chicago: $37k → 14%University of Arizona Foundation: $5k → 15%American Research Institute in Turkey: $160k → 22%ARTogether: $10k → 10%Koc Education Culture and Healthcare: $70k → 17%University of Central Florida Foundation: $39k → 13%University of Michigan: $60k → 14%The University of Kansas Center for: $17k → 15%University of Chicago: $37k → 14%American Research Institute in Turkey: $160k → 22%ARTogether: $10k → 10%Koc Education Culture and Healthcare: $60k → 17%University of Central Florida Foundation: $39k → 13%University of Michigan: $57k → 14%The University of Kansas Center for: $16k → 15%University of Chicago: $36k → 14%American Research Institute in Turkey: $160k → 22%ARTogether: $15k → 10%Koc Education Culture and Healthcare: $60k → 17%University of Central Florida Foundation: $39k → 13%University of Michigan: $50k → 14%The University of Kansas Center for: $13k → 15%University of Chicago: $10k → 14%American Research Institute in Turkey: $160k → 22%University of California Berkeley: $20k → 10%The Regents of the University of: $40k → 14%American Research Institute in Turkey: $45k → 22%University of California Berkeley: $20k → 10%The Regents of the University of: $6k → 14%University of Pennsylvania Museum: $33k → 22%University of California Berkeley: $20k → 10%Trustees of the University of: $30k → 22%University of Pennsylvania Museum of: $30k → 22%American Research Institute in Turkey: $10k → 22%American Research Institute in Turkey: $10k → 22%American Research Institute in Turkey: $10k → 22%American Research Institute in Turkey: $10k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
PA
CA
NE
AZ
KS
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of The Merops Foundation 6178-01-16’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Merops Foundation 6178-01-16lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 12 repeat orgs$215k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$2.4M
$182k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+52%

Still filing today

58%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureSocial ScienceScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AR
    AMERICAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE IN TURKEY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $995k · revenue +74%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $197k · revenue +86%
  • IO
    INSTITUTE OF NAUTICAL ARCHAEOLOGY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $181k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • KE
    Koc Education Culture and Healthcare Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +52% · 35% of their budget
  • BO
    Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska for the University of Nebraska-Lincoln
    one grant, 2020 · $37k
  • UO
    University of Pennsylvania Museum of
    one grant, 2022 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Governors of the University of Calgary

The University of Calgary is a global intellectual hub located in Canada's most enterprising city. In this spirited, high quality learning environment students will thrive in programs made rich by research, hands-on experiences and…

2
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
3
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
4
American University of Armenia Corporation

Support of the educational and research activities of the american university of armenia (aua).

Education
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy Inc

Aura provides innovative, open resources to enable discovery and excellence in research, to unify the astrophysics communities, and to promote public understanding of our universe and the benefits of scientific exploration.

Science & Tech
7
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
8
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

9
The American University of Iraq Foundation Inc

To promote higher education in iraq based on the american liberal arts model.

Education
10
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
11
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
12
The Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge

The mission of the university of cambridge is to contribute to society through the pursuit of education, learning, and research at the highest international levels of excellence. organizationally, we achieve this through two divisions…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arizona Foundation and the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Koc Education Culture and Healthcare — $260,000 · OtherKoc Education Culture and HealthcareUniversity of Michigan — $167,378 · OtherUniversity of MichiganREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $166,071 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANBoard of Regents of the University of — $142,936 · OtherBoard of Regents of the University ofThe University of Kansas Center for — $71,853 · OtherThe University of Kansas Center forUniversity of California Berkeley — $60,000 · OtherUniversity of California BerkeleyKoc Education Culture and Healthcare Foundation — $50,000 · OtherBoard of Regents of the University of Nebraska for the University of Nebraska-Lincoln — $37,245 · Other+3 more — $90,200 · Other+3 moreAMERICAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE IN TURKEY — $995,000 · Social ScienceAMERICAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE IN TURKEYUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $196,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CE…University of Chicago — $120,181 · EducationUniversity of Ch…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $29,700 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE …UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CA…University of Arizona Foundation — $15,494 · EducationINSTITUTE OF NAUTICAL ARCHAEOLOGY — $180,808 · Arts & CultureINSTITUTE…ARTogether — $50,000 · Arts & CultureARTogethe…University of Kansas Center for Research Inc — $12,568 · Science & Tech
Other$1,045,683Social Science$995,000Education$386,875Arts & Culture$230,808Science & Tech$12,568

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE IN TURKEY — $995,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $196,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE OF NAUTICAL ARCHAEOLOGY — $180,808 over 4y, 9.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $167,378 over 2y, 23% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $120,181 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARTogether — $50,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetKoc Education Culture and Healthcare Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $29,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $15,494 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc — $12,568 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE IN TURKEY
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF NAUTICAL ARCHAEOLOGY
  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds University of Chicago
  • Who funds ARTogether
  • Who funds Koc Education Culture and Healthcare Foundation
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation
  • Who funds University of Kansas Center for Research Inc

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Merops Foundation 6178-01-16 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Merops Foundation 6178-01-16?

    Find your warmest path to The Merops Foundation 6178-01-16 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph