· Public charity
The Maryland Association of Soil Conservation Districts Incorporated
Mascd's mission is to promote practical and effective soil, water, and related natural resouces programs to all citizens through individual conservation districts on a voluntary basis through leadership, education, cooperation and local direction.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| QUEEN ANNE SCD | $26,298 |
| MPT FOUNDATION | $18,250 |
| KENT SCD | $17,374 |
| TALBOT SCD | $12,262 |
| SAND COUNTY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- QAQUEEN ANNES SCD8× · 2017–2025 · $195k
- CSCARROLL SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT7× · 2017–2023 · $194k
- SCSUSSEX CONSERVATION DIST7× · 2017–2023 · $189k
Funded once
- SCSUSSEX CONSERVATION DISTRICTone grant, 2018 · $73k
- TATEAM AG INCone grant, 2022 · $66k
- RERESOURCE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONSone grant, 2019 · $29k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: National Association of Conservation Districts
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Maryland Association of Soil Conservation Districts Incorporated funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Maryland Association of Soil Conservation Districts Incorporated. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Maryland Association of Soil Conservation Districts’ filings →