Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Mahatma - Dharma Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2022
9
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Education$167kHealth$124kInternational$28kReligion$3k
02FY2022 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES FOUNDATION$5,000
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$5,000
WILLS EYE FOUNDATION$5,000
TEXAS WOMAN'S UNIVERSITY$5,000
RICE UNIVERSITY$5,000
TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CH$5,000
UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER$5,000
IRVING HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$3,000
HOCKADAY SCHOOL$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%THE PENN FUND: $3k → 22%AKSHYA PATRA: $3k → 14%SURGICAL EYE EXPEDITIONS INTERNATIO: $3k → 14%UNICEF USA: $3k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TX SW MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 14%PRATHAM USA: $5k → 16%PURDUE FOUNDATION: $5k → 19%THE PENN FUND: $3k → 22%UNICEF USA: $3k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TX SW MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 14%PRATHAM USA: $5k → 16%PURDUE FOUNDATION: $5k → 19%THE PENN FUND: $3k → 22%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $5k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TX SW MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 14%PRATHAM USA: $5k → 16%PURDUE FOUNDATION: $3k → 19%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $5k → 17%IRVING HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%PRATHAM USA: $3k → 16%PURDUE FOUNDATION: $3k → 19%WILLS EYE FOUNDATION: $10k → 22%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $3k → 17%IRVING HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%PRATHAM USA: $3k → 16%WILLS EYE FOUNDATION: $5k → 22%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $3k → 17%IRVING HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%RICE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 16%WILLS EYE FOUNDATION: $5k → 22%RICE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%WILLS EYE FOUNDATION: $5k → 22%RICE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%WILLS EYE FOUNDATION: $5k → 22%RICE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%RICE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%RICE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 14%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $5k → 16%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $5k → 16%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $5k → 16%UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 14%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $5k → 16%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $5k → 16%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $5k → 16%TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CH: $5k → 14%TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CH: $5k → 14%TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CH: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$308k · 17 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2022, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
5

Total granted

$308k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+65%

Still filing today

53%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EducationInternationalPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    William Marsh Rice University
    6× · 2017–2022 · $35k · revenue +104%
  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    6× · 2017–2022 · $30k · revenue +67%
  • PU
    PRATHAM USA
    5× · 2017–2021 · $21k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • DH
    DFW HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • SE
    SURGICAL EYE EXPEDITIONS INTERNATIONAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +65%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
4
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
5
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
8
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
9
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is William Marsh Rice University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TEXAS WOMANS UNIVERSITY — $25,000 · OtherTEXAS WOMANS UNIVERSITYTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CH — $21,000 · OtherTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHCOLORADO SCHOOL 1 MINES FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherCOLORADO SCHOOL 1 MINES FOUNDATIONPURDUE FOUNDATION — $16,000 · OtherPURDUE FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF TX SW MEDICAL CENTER — $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TX SW MEDICAL CENTERTHE PENN FUND — $11,500 · OtherTHE PENN FUNDUT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER — $10,000 · OtherUT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER+5 more — $14,500 · Other+5 moreWilliam Marsh Rice University — $35,000 · EducationWilliam Marsh Rice UniversityWILLS EYE FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · EducationWILLS EYE FOUNDATION INCBaylor College of Medicine — $30,000 · EducationBaylor College of MedicineHOCKADAY SCHOOL — $15,000 · EducationHOCKADAY SCHOOLCOLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationCOLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES FOUNDATIONMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $19,000 · InternationalMEDECINS …UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $6,000 · InternationalUNITED ST…SURGICAL EYE EXPEDITIONS INTERNATIONAL INC — $3,000 · InternationalSURGICAL …PRATHAM USA — $21,000 · PhilanthropyIrving Healthcare Foundation — $19,000 · Health
Other$133,000Education$120,000International$28,000Philanthropy$21,000Health$19,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University — $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWILLS EYE FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPRATHAM USA — $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIrving Healthcare Foundation — $19,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOCKADAY SCHOOL — $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSURGICAL EYE EXPEDITIONS INTERNATIONAL INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds William Marsh Rice University
  • Who funds WILLS EYE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine
  • Who funds PRATHAM USA
  • Who funds Irving Healthcare Foundation
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds HOCKADAY SCHOOL
  • Who funds COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
  • Who funds SURGICAL EYE EXPEDITIONS INTERNATIONAL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Mahatma - Dharma Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph