Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mabel Ekman Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$76k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$308kInternational$10kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $68,400, the rows itemized in this filing. The $75,900 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $37k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$713k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GETHSEMANE LUTHERAN CHURCH$17,000
LUTHERAN SUNSET MINISTRIES$10,000
LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF$10,000
PACIFIC LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY$5,200
Individual grant recipient$5,200
ABIDING GRACE LUTHERAN ENDOWMENT$5,000
HOLDEN VILLAGE LUTHERAN RET COMMUN$5,000
FRIENDS OF MOLINE LUTHERAN CEMETARY$5,000
ELIM LUTHERAN CHURCH$2,500
PASTORAL BENEVOLANT FUND$2,500
LUTHERAN INDIAN MINISTRIES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AUGSBURG LUTHERAN: $5k → 11%ELIM LUTHERAN CHURCH: $3k → 8%FRIENDS OF MOLINE LUTHERAN CEMETARY: $5k → 10%ABIDING GRACE LUTHERAN ENDOWMENT: $5k → 11%LUTHERAN SUNSET MINISTRIES: $10k → 12%PASTORAL BENEVOLANT FUND: $3k → 13%LUTHERAN INDIAN MINISTRIES: $1k → 5%PACIFIC LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 9%HOLDEN VILLAGE LUTHERAN RET COMMUN: $5k → 9%LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF: $10k → 19%GETHSEMANE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $60k → 10%GETHSEMANE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $43k → 10%GETHSEMANE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $40k → 10%GETHSEMANE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $40k → 10%GETHSEMANE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $40k → 10%GETHSEMANE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $20k → 10%GETHSEMANE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $17k → 10%GETHSEMANE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $17k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
1/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GETHSEMANE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $277,000 · OtherGETHSEMANE LUTHERAN CHURCH+7 more: $26,200 · Other+7 moreLUTHERAN SUNSET MINISTRIES: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $10,000 · InternationalPacific Lutheran University: $5,200 · Education
Other$303,200Housing & Shelter$10,000International$10,000Education$5,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLUTHERAN SUNSET MINISTRIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Lutheran University: $5,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN ASSOCIATION OF MISSIONARIES AND PILOTS US: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUTHERAN SUNSET MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Lutheran University ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN ASSOCIATION OF MISSIONARIES AND PILOTS US ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mabel Ekman Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mabel Ekman Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc: 47% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mabel Ekman’s filings →

More from the funding graph