· Private foundation
The Loreen Beisswenger Farish Charitable Foundation Uad 11/3/2010
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $95k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $377k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY | $160,000 |
| GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND | $60,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE TREASURE COAST | $55,000 |
| OCEAN CITY ARTS CENTER | $52,000 |
| HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF PALM BEACH COUNTY | $50,000 |
| PEGGY ADAMS ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE | $40,000 |
| FURRY FRIENDS ADOPTION AND CLINIC INC | $40,000 |
| ROTARY CLUB OF WEST PALM BEACH | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $260k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PBPALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC5× · 2020–2024 · $800k · revenue +41%
- HSHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE TREASURE COAST INC5× · 2020–2024 · $295k · revenue +23%
- GEGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC5× · 2020–2024 · $260k · revenue +66%
Funded once
- PAPEGGY ADAMS ANIMAL RESUCE LEAGUEone grant, 2020 · $50k
- FFFURRY FRIENDS ADOPTION AND CLINIC-HUMANE SOCIETY GREATER JUPITERone grant, 2020 · $30k
- FFFurry Friends Humane Incgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +80%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE TREASURE COAST INC ↗
- Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds OCEAN CITY ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds Peggy Adams Animal Rescue League of the Palm Beaches Inc ↗
- Who funds Furry Friends Humane Inc ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Loreen Beisswenger Farish Charitable Foundation Uad 11/3/2010 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Palm Beach Atlantic University Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Loreen Beisswenger Farish Charitable Foundation Uad 11/3/2010?
Find your warmest path to The Loreen Beisswenger Farish Charitable Foundation Uad 11/3/2010 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.