Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Lifeshare Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.7M
Granted FY2017
16
Grants FY2017
3
States reached
$768k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2017 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k5 grants · $12k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$100,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAGNOLIA SPEECH SCHOOL$767,925
CHILDREN'S CANCER FUND$600,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER JAC$250,000
MISSISSIPPI COLLEGE$240,000
UMMC THE CAMPAIGN FOR CHILDRENS OF$200,000
MS CHILDREN'S HOME SERVICES$200,000
JUVENILE RESEARCH DIABETES FOUNDAT$101,534
MTK FOUNDATION$100,000
CANOPY CHILDREN'S SOLUTIONS$100,000
SUNNYBROOK CHILDRENS' HOME$50,000
PALMER HOME FOR CHILDREN$50,000
MS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND$4,430
ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF MS$3,500
FRENCH CAMP ACADEMY$1,500
COMMUNITY ANIMAL RESCUE ADOPTION$1,500
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 14%SUNNYBROOK CHILDRENS' HOME: $50k → 11%PALMER HOME FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mississippi Children's Home Services Inc

To improve the lives of children and families by providing a continuum of compassionate, measurable, and effective behavioral health and social services by providing management services to mississippi children's home society and cares…

Human Services
2
Methodist Children's Home

Methodist children's home equips children, youth, and families to flourish by offering hope through christian-centered relationships, services, and support.

Human Services
3
Cares Center Inc

To improve the lives of children and families by providing a continuum of compassionate, measurable, and effective behavioral health, education, and social services.

Education
4
Children's Foundation of Mississippi

To improve the well-being of mississippi's children through the design, promotion and improvement of systems and services.

Youth Development
5
The Mississippi Center for Medically Fragile Children Inc

To provide the first pediatric skilled nursing facility in the state of mississippi that not only helps children and families transition from the hospital back to their homes, but also provides long-term care for some of our state's most…

6
Marshall Christian Academy Inc

The mission of the organization is to partner with christian parents, to provide quality christian education, and to prepare students for a lifetime of fruitful christian service.

Education
7
Children's House Montessori School Inc

Preschool, kindergarten, and childcare for enrolled students only

Education
8
United Methodist Children's Home

Serving abused, neglected and abandoned children through group homes and foster care; facilitating adoptions; and family preservation.

Human Services
9
Mississippi Charter Schools Association

The mississippi charter schools association drives the development and growth of high-quality public charter schools through school support, advocacy, and outreach.

Education
10
Marjorie Williams Academy Incorporated

The academy is a charter school operating under north carolina governmental regulations. the students are residents of the childrens home where the campus is located.

Education
11
Maple Manor Christian Home Inc

Nursing home to provide medical care in addition to room and board; provide physical property for operations of children home to care for displaced and at-risk children.

Human Services
12
Ni Magnuson Christian School

We are a christ-centered, academically excellent, educational community that develops the whole child - heart, soul, mind, and body. we are a k-8 private christian school.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mississippi Children's Home Society and the most unlike its peers is Mtk Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHILDREN'S CANCER FUND — $600,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S CANCER FUNDMS CHILDREN'S HOME SERVICES — $200,000 · OtherMS CHILDREN'S HOME SERVICESUMMC THE CAMPAIGN FOR CHILDRENS OF — $200,000 · OtherUMMC THE CAMPAIGN FOR CHILDRENS OFJUVENILE RESEARCH DIABETES FOUNDAT — $101,534 · OtherJUVENILE RESEARCH DIABETES FOUNDATMISSISSIPPI CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY — $100,000 · OtherMISSISSIPPI CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY+3 more — $9,430 · OtherMAGNOLIA SPEECH SCHOOL — $767,925 · HealthMAGNOLIA SPEECH SCHOOLMississippi College — $240,000 · EducationMississippi Co…MTK FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EducationMTK FOUNDATION+1 more — $1,500 · EducationCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MISSISSIPPI — $250,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY …SUNNYBROOK CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesPALMER HOME FOR CHILDREN — $50,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,500 · Human Services
Other$1,210,964Health$767,925Education$341,500Philanthropy$250,000Human Services$101,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAGNOLIA SPEECH SCHOOL — $767,925 over 1y, 29% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MISSISSIPPI — $250,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetMississippi College — $240,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMISSISSIPPI CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSUNNYBROOK CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $50,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetPALMER HOME FOR CHILDREN — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFRENCH CAMP ACADEMY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Van Devender Family Foundation William Van Devender TrusteeMS17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Van Devender Family Foundation William Van Devender Trustee · Ergon Foundation Inc · The Gertrude C Ford Foundation Inc · Selby and Richard McRae Foundation · Community Foundation for Mississippi · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Wesley a Caldwell Foundation Inc · Howard & Mary Eliza McMillan Foundation · Feild Co-Operative Association · Walker Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Lifeshare Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2018) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2017, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph