Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Leyli Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Arts & Culture$736kCommunity Improvement$50kPhilanthropy$20kInternational$13kEducation$5k
02FY2021 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$49,598
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PIONEER WORKS ART FOUNDATION$49,598
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%THE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL: $5k → 22%THE ASIA FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%CREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%FILM FORUM INC: $33k → 17%PIONEER WORKS ART FOUNDATION: $160k → 20%CENTRI COMMUNITIES: $50k → 14%THE MIAMI FOUNDATION: $20k → 15%THE ASIA FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%FILM FORUM INC: $28k → 17%PIONEER WORKS ART FOUNDATION: $150k → 20%FILM FORUM INC: $25k → 17%PIONEER WORKS ART FOUNDATION: $60k → 20%THE FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC PURPOSE MEDIA INC: $150k → 17%PIONEER WORKS ART FOUNDATION: $50k → 20%PIONEER WORKS ART FOUNDATION: $50k → 20%ST ANN'S WAREHOUSE: $25k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$569k · 3 repeat orgs$235k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$569k
$235k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-13%
+147%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PW
    PIONEER WORKS ART FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2021 · $470k · revenue +65%
  • FF
    FILM FORUM INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $87k · revenue -20%
  • TA
    THE ASIA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2020 · $13k · revenue -13%

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC PURPOSE MEDIA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $150k
  • CT
    CENTRI TECH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +751% · 33% of their budget
  • SA
    ST ANN'S WAREHOUSE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
2
Public Art Fund Inc

As the leader in its field, public art fund brings dynamic contemporary art to a broad audience in new york city and beyond by mounting ambitious free exhibitions of international scope and impact that offer the public powerful experiences…

—
3
Foundation for Contemporary Arts Inc

To encourage, sponsor, and promote innovative work in the arts created and presented by individuals, groups, and organizations.

Arts & Culture
4
Site Santa Fe

Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.

Arts & Culture
5
Partners of the Americas Foundation

To advance the social economic well being of the americas.

International
6
Peninsula Arts Guild

Broaden cultural and artistic offerings in the san francisco bay area's peninsula region and enable community-programmed events through the operation of a performing arts facility.

Arts & Culture
7
Aia Foundation

Architects use the power of design to solve problems, transform lives, and create a better world. the architects foundation inspires and empowers the next generation of designers and the diverse communities they serve. the architects…

Education
8
Institute for the Future

Institute for the future is the world's leading futures organization. our mission is to prepare the world to create better, more equitable futures by disrupting short-term thinking with visions of transformative possibilities.

Education
9
International Women's Forum Inc

The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…

Education
10
California Film Institute

The california film institute celebrates film and videos as art and education. its goal is to present and support emerging and established independent filmakers whose works address issues relevant to contemporary society. this is…

Arts & Culture
11
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
12
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Asia Foundation; the most unlike its peers is St Ann's Warehouse Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PIONEER WORKS ART FOUNDATION: $469,598 · Arts & CulturePIONEER WORKS ART FOUNDATIONFILM FORUM INC: $86,731 · Arts & CultureFILM FORUM INCST ANN'S WAREHOUSE INC: $25,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC PURPOSE MEDIA INC: $150,000 · OtherTHE FOUNDATION FOR PU…+1 more: $5,000 · OtherCENTRI TECH FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Community ImprovementTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ASIA FOUNDATION: $13,000 · International
Arts & Culture$586,329Other$155,000Community Improvement$50,000Philanthropy$20,000International$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPIONEER WORKS ART FOUNDATION: $469,598 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetFILM FORUM INC: $86,731 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCENTRI TECH FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetST ANN'S WAREHOUSE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASIA FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILADELPHIA SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREATIVE VISIONS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Leyli Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Leyli Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Leyli’s filings →

    More from the funding graph