Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lexicon Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$1.3MReligion$598kPhilanthropy$258kFood & Nutrition$22kEducation$16kHealth$15kCrime & Legal$14kPublic Benefit$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$455
Median grant
2
States reached
$99
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$9,600
TZEDUKAS HUIR INC$455
BEER YITZCHOK$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ACHIEZER: $4k → 6%ACHIEZER: $4k → 6%ACHIEZER: $3k → 6%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $2k → 11%ACHIEZER: $1k → 6%ACHIEZER: $200 → 6%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $200 → 11%TZEDUKAS HUIR INC: $12k → 14%OHRAH: $100 → 11%CHAI 4EVER INC: $100 → 11%TZEDUKAS HUIR INC: $5k → 14%TZEDUKAS HUIR INC: $2k → 14%CHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE: $1k → 14%TZEDUKAS HUIR INC: $1k → 14%TORAS MOSHE: $100 → 20%TZEDUKAS HUIR INC: $540 → 14%TZEDUKAS HUIR INC: $455 → 14%CHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE: $410 → 14%KEREN HALBUSHA: $360 → 14%CHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE: $200 → 14%YAZOIRY: $180 → 14%CHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE: $180 → 14%YAZOIRY: $100 → 14%SHOE DISCOUNT CORP: $1k → 20%KEREN HALBUSHA: $500 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $720 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $612 → 20%A TIME: $172 → 20%LECHEM VCHOLOV INC: $120 → 20%A TIME: $108 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $316 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $180 → 20%A TIME: $100 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 217 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

217 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 214 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

217
292

Total granted

$1.8M
$173k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+1%

Still filing today

12%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesReligionEducationHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    TZEDUKAS HUIR INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $22k · revenue ×11
  • AC
    ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $12k · revenue +35%
  • TA
    TZEDEK ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $11k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • CS
    CONG SHAREI TORAH OF KH
    one grant, 2022 · $23k
  • YT
    YESHIVA TALPIOT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +58%
  • VC
    VARIOUS CONTRIBUTIONS TO NEEDY INDI
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Chasdei Yetev Lev Inc

Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.

—
4
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
5
Zera Koidesh Inc

To award financial grants to religios orthodox jewish organizations and to help by financial means, the needy, sick and disabled people.

—
6
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
7
Mifal Tzedaka Vchesed Chasdei Aharo N Inc

Provide financial assistance to torah and talmudic scholars, as well as to other needy individuals and other organizations that work to promote these purposes.

Philanthropy
8
Zichron Meshilem Feish Inc

Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations

—
9
Mishken Chaim Rivnits

Assistance to the indigent

Religion
10
Zichron Moshe Elihu Tzedoka Fund
Philanthropy
11
Yeshivas D'var Torah Inc

Organization raises funds which are disbursed to religious schools of higher education and talmudic research

Philanthropy
12
Ahavas Torah V'chesed
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tomchei Tzedaka Corp; the most unlike its peers is Keren Torah Vchesed. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 510 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
56/67
Grantees still filing
47/67
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOSDOS V'YOEL MOSHE D'SATMAR: $188,010 · OtherMOSDOS V'YOEL MOSHE D'SATMARSHERI TORAH INC: $182,500 · OtherSHERI TORAH INCIndividual grant recipient: $172,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYESHIVA GEDOLA OHR YISROEL: $126,850 · OtherYESHIVA GEDOLA OHR YISROELCONGREGATION BETH ARYEH: $102,816 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH ARYEHEZRAS ALTA FIEGA: $60,587 · Other+170 more: $909,179 · Other+170 moreTHE OJC FUND: $253,200 · EducationTHE OJC FUNDYESHIVA TALPIOT INC: $10,000 · EducationTZEDUKAS HUIR INC: $21,627 · Human ServicesACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $11,952 · Human ServicesCHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE INC: $1,970 · Human ServicesKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $1,900 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $1,828 · Human Services+2 more: $1,860 · Human ServicesAYZER LALIYA INC: $22,200 · ReligionTALMUD TORAH BRESLOV INC: $6,450 · Religion+3 more: $2,790 · ReligionKIPAS TZEDUKAH INC: $2,476 · PhilanthropyBEIS YOSEF CHAIM INC: $1,440 · PhilanthropyRodef Chesed DBA Ahavas Chesed: $1,360 · PhilanthropyTHE YAD LELEV FOUNDATION INC: $1,115 · PhilanthropyDESHA FOUNDATION: $1,010 · PhilanthropyCHAI LIFELINE INC: $2,070 · HealthBIKUR CHOLIM INC: $2,058 · HealthLev Leyeled Inc: $1,180 · HealthBAYIS LEPLEITOS - ATERES BONOS INC: $5,000 · InternationalVYAZREIM INC: $3,682 · Public Benefit
Other$1,742,842Education$263,200Human Services$41,137Religion$31,440Philanthropy$7,401Health$5,308International$5,000Public Benefit$3,682

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE OJC FUND: $253,200 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAYZER LALIYA INC: $22,200 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTZEDUKAS HUIR INC: $21,627 over 6y, 7.8% of budgetACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $11,952 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTZEDEK ASSOCIATION: $10,955 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTALMUD TORAH BRESLOV INC: $6,450 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBAYIS LEPLEITOS - ATERES BONOS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVYAZREIM INC: $3,682 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOHR BACHOSHECH INC: $3,166 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetKIPAS TZEDUKAH INC: $2,476 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $2,070 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM INC: $2,058 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE INC: $1,970 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $1,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $1,828 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBEIS YOSEF CHAIM INC: $1,440 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRodef Chesed DBA Ahavas Chesed: $1,360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLev Leyeled Inc: $1,180 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YAD LELEV FOUNDATION INC: $1,115 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDESHA FOUNDATION: $1,010 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHAYIM V CHESED: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTALMUD TORAH TZFAT INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSHOE DISCOUNT CORP: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetKEREN HALBUSHA INC: $860 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetMOSDOS BETH YOSEF ZVI: $790 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE OJC FUND ↗
  • Who funds AYZER LALIYA INC ↗
  • Who funds TZEDUKAS HUIR INC ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TZEDEK ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA TALPIOT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY121.9× affinity194 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · The Schwartz Charitable Foundation Inc · Zelig and Rifky Weiss Family Foundation Inc · Madanim Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Bochner Foundation · Nimlach Foundation · R' Shaya Ben Moshe Foundation · Rovna Ct Foundation · Hf Foundation · Strulovich Family Foundation Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lexicon Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lexicon Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Yeshiva Toras Aron Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Oorah Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Lexicon Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Lexicon Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 510 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lexicon’s filings →

More from the funding graph