Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Levy-Markus Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$310kHealth$115kPhilanthropy$110kReligion$100kEducation$95kHuman Services$60kInternational$20kArts & Culture$15k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEVERLY HILLS COMMUNITY FARM$50,000
JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL$20,000
CEDARS SINAI$20,000
ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND$15,000
NATIONAL HEALTH LAW PROGRAM INC$10,000
DRINK LOCAL DRINK TAP INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $15k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$690k · 10 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +95% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$690k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
+25%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalFood & NutritionHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $85k · revenue +55%
  • IG
    ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND
    8× · 2018–2025 · $60k · revenue +147%
  • TN
    THE NEGEV FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2022 · $55k · revenue +537%

Funded once

  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museumgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +25%
  • AC
    AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR WEIITMAN TRUST
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
2
Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc

Jewish national fund gives all generations of jews a unique voice in building a prosperous future for the land of israel and its people.

International
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
6
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
7
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
8
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
9
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
10
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
11
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
12
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Jewish Federations of North America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BEVERLY HILLS COMMUNITY FARM INC DBA CITY GREENS COMMUNITY FARM: $255,000 · Food & NutritionBEVERLY HILLS COMMUNITY FARM INC DB…JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL: $100,000 · OtherJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAELUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FOUNDATIONLEO BAECK EDUCATION CENTR: $29,700 · OtherLEO BAECK EDUCATION CENTRLEO BAECK EDUCATION CENTER: $20,000 · OtherLEO BAECK EDUCATION CENTERALYN FOUNDATION HOSPITAL: $20,000 · OtherALYN FOUNDATION HOSPITALAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR WEIITMAN TRUST: $15,000 · OtherAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR WEIITMAN…THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $95,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FE…CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $85,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI …NATIONAL HEALTH LAW PROGRAM INC: $10,000 · HealthNATIONAL HEAL…THE NEGEV FOUNDATION: $55,000 · InternationalTHE NEGEV …DRINK LOCAL DRINK TAP INC: $20,000 · InternationalDRINK LOCA…ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $60,000 · Human ServicesThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $15,000 · Arts & Culture
Food & Nutrition$255,000Other$229,700Philanthropy$95,000Health$95,000International$75,000Human Services$60,000Arts & Culture$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBEVERLY HILLS COMMUNITY FARM INC DBA CITY GREENS COMMUNITY FARM: $255,000 over 6y, 62% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $95,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $85,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $60,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NEGEV FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetDRINK LOCAL DRINK TAP INC: $20,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BEVERLY HILLS COMMUNITY FARM INC DBA CITY GREENS COMMUNITY FARM ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds THE NEGEV FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DRINK LOCAL DRINK TAP INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL HEALTH LAW PROGRAM INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Levy-Markus Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Levy-Markus Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Levy-Markus’ filings →

    More from the funding graph