Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lassor and Fanny Agoos Charity Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$207k
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$282kHousing & Shelter$281kHealth$258kHuman Services$237kEmployment$155kArts & Culture$122kEducation$69kFood & Nutrition$49kOther$0
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k40 grants · $117k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $91k
$2,500
Median grant
14
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES$25,000
BETH ISREAL DEACONESS HOSPITAL$17,500
PINE STREET INN$12,000
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES$12,000
ROSIE'S PLACE$12,000
FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICES$12,000
2LIFE COMMUNITIES$6,500
MASS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY FOR CHILDREN$6,500
HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS$6,000
ORGANIZED COMMUNITIES AGAINST DEPORTATION$5,500
Individual grant recipient$3,500
UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND$3,500
UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS$3,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS$3,500
GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $236k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOMANADE AT THE PINEHILLS INC: $3k → 8%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $5k → 16%VASSAR-WARNER HOME: $6k → 9%ADA JENKINS CENTER: $1k → 10%MERCY CHEFS: $3k → 20%CENTRAL VERMONT HOME HEALTH AND HOSPICE: $3k → 9%WOMANADE AT THE PINEHILLS INC: $3k → 8%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $5k → 16%WOMANADE AT THE PINEHILLS INC: $3k → 8%MISSION OF DEEDS: $5k → 8%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $5k → 16%TOCO HILLS COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $3k → 14%WOMANADE AT THE PINEHILLS INC: $3k → 8%MISSION OF DEEDS: $1k → 8%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $5k → 16%TOCO HILLS COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $3k → 14%WOMANADE AT THE PINEHILLS INC: $3k → 8%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $5k → 16%WOMANADE AT THE PINEHILLS INC: $3k → 8%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $5k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $15k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $15k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $14k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $14k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $14k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $12k → 16%DOROT: $3k → 17%METRO WEST WOMEN'S FUND: $4k → 8%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%DOROT: $3k → 17%METRO WEST WOMEN'S FUND: $3k → 8%METRO WEST WOMEN'S FUND: $3k → 8%PINE STREET INN: $8k → 16%METRO WEST WOMEN'S FUND: $3k → 8%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $6k → 16%METRO WEST WOMEN'S FUND: $3k → 8%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $4k → 16%METRO WEST WOMEN'S FUND: $1k → 8%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $3k → 16%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $3k → 16%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $3k → 16%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $3k → 16%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $1k → 16%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $1k → 16%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $1k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $5k → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
MN
IL
NY
MA
WY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 51 repeat orgs$154k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

51 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
39

Total granted

$1.3M
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
0%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $155k · revenue +103%
  • PINE STREET INN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $110k · revenue +123%
  • RP
    ROSIE'S PLACE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $109k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • VH
    VASSAR-WARNER HOME
    one grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue -88%
  • PP
    POUGHKEEPSIE PUBLIC LIBRARY DISTRICT
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • IC
    INTOWN COLLABORATIVE MINISTRIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +95%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metropolitan Boston Housing Partnership Inc D/B/a Metro Housing Boston

Metro housing boston mobilizes wide-ranging resources to provide innovative and personalized services that lead families and individuals to housing stability, economic security, and an improved quality of life.

Housing & Shelter
2
People Inc

People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…

Human Services
3
Massachusetts Council of Human Services Providers Inc

To advance the interests of the human services sector and providers through advocacy, education, and engagement of diverse stakeholders for collective impact.

—
4
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
5
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
6
Massachusetts Housing Investment Corporation

Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…

Housing & Shelter
7
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
8
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
9
Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies Inc

The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…

Human Services
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
Massachusetts Affordable Housing Alliance Inc

Maha breaks down barriers facing first-time and first-generation home buyers and owners through education, counseling, advocacy, and grassroots organizing.

Housing & Shelter
12
Volunteer Lawyers Project of the Boston Bar Association Inc

The mission of the volunteer lawyers project of the boston bar association is to increase access to justice by delivering high quality pro bono civil legal services to eligible clients in the greater boston area.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc; the most unlike its peers is Canfei Nesharim. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

76 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 76 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
74/76
Grantees still filing
48/76
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS HOSPITAL: $115,500 · OtherBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS HOSPITALJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $84,750 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INCSOUTH HADLEY FAMILY CENTER INC: $35,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $30,250 · OtherMASS SOC PREVENTION CRUELTY CHILDREN: $26,200 · OtherGATEWAYS ACCESS TO JEWISH EDUCATION INC: $23,000 · Other+65 more: $367,900 · Other+65 moreCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $233,500 · PhilanthropyCombined Jewish …FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC: $12,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropyPINE STREET INN INC: $110,250 · Human ServicesPINE STREET INN …THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $46,250 · Human ServicesTHE HOME FOR LIT…UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $17,750 · Human ServicesUNITED SOUTH END…Womanade at The Pinehills Inc co Stonebridge Club: $17,000 · Human ServicesWomanade at The …METROWEST WOMEN'S FUND INC: $15,500 · Human ServicesMETROWEST WOMEN'…+8 more: $34,250 · Human Services+8 moreROSIE'S PLACE INC: $108,750 · Housing & ShelterROSIE'S PL…2LIFE COMMUNITIES INC: $43,500 · Housing & Shelter2LIFE COMM…+4 more: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC: $155,250 · EmploymentJEWISH VOC…Upstream USA Inc: $38,000 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $25,000 · HealthNYS ALLIANCE FOR THE PREVENTION OF SEXUAL ABUSE IN: $10,500 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $8,000 · HealthCLAIRE'S PLACE FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · HealthJOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF DELAWARE INC: $5,000 · HealthBOSTON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS INC: $4,500 · Health+2 more: $3,500 · HealthARTS FOR LEARNING MASSACHUSETTS INC: $39,000 · Arts & CultureEMBRACING OUR DIFFERENCES INC: $28,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $20,750 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$682,600Philanthropy$248,000Human Services$241,000Housing & Shelter$159,750Employment$155,250Health$109,500Arts & Culture$88,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $233,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC: $155,250 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $110,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $108,750 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $84,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $46,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budget2LIFE COMMUNITIES INC: $43,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetARTS FOR LEARNING MASSACHUSETTS INC: $39,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetUpstream USA Inc: $38,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $30,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEMBRACING OUR DIFFERENCES INC: $28,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC: $25,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGATEWAYS ACCESS TO JEWISH EDUCATION INC: $23,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC: $22,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $20,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $20,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $17,750 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWomanade at The Pinehills Inc co Stonebridge Club: $17,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN: $16,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUS CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK: $16,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMETROWEST WOMEN'S FUND INC: $15,500 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetISLAND FOOD PANTRY OF MARTHA'S VINEYARD INC: $13,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPERFORMING ARTS CENTER OF METROWEST INC: $13,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetNYS ALLIANCE FOR THE PREVENTION OF SEXUAL ABUSE IN: $10,500 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPEARL S BUCK INTERNATIONAL INC: $7,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCLAIRE'S PLACE FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL COUNCIL OF NEW ENGLAND INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBROWN SCHOOL: $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVASSAR-WARNER HOME: $6,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMission of Deeds Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTOCO HILLS COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOrganized Communities Against Deportations: $5,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SARASOTA COUNTY: $5,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetINTOWN COLLABORATIVE MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF DELAWARE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARENTS HELPING PARENTS - THE ROUNDTABLE OF SUPPORT INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetBOSTON COMMUNITY PEDIATRICS INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLACKLIDGE COMMUNITY COLLECTIVE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetISLAND HOUSING TRUST CORPORATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWomen for Afghan Women Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC ↗
  • Who funds 2LIFE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTS FOR LEARNING MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Upstream USA Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds EMBRACING OUR DIFFERENCES INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAYS ACCESS TO JEWISH EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS ↗
  • Who funds Womanade at The Pinehills Inc co Stonebridge Club ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds US CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds METROWEST WOMEN'S FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND FOOD PANTRY OF MARTHA'S VINEYARD INC ↗
  • Who funds PERFORMING ARTS CENTER OF METROWEST INC ↗
  • Who funds FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
  • Who funds NYS ALLIANCE FOR THE PREVENTION OF SEXUAL ABUSE IN ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PEARL S BUCK INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CLAIRE'S PLACE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS ALL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity FundMA19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity Fund · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Klarman Family Foundation · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lassor and Fanny Agoos Charity Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lassor and Fanny Agoos Charity Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Jewish Vocational Service Inc: 39% of income from government
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Delaware Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Boston Community Pediatrics Inc: 10% of income from government
  • 2LIFE Communities Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Gateways Access to Jewish Education Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Upstream Usa Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Arts for Learning Massachusetts Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Central Vermont Home Health & Hospice Inc: 3% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Island Housing Trust Corporation: 1% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Friends of Mvyradio Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Island Grown Initiative Ltd: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Lassor and Fanny Agoos Charity Fund?

Find your warmest path to The Lassor and Fanny Agoos Charity Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 108 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lassor and Fanny Agoos Charity’s filings →

More from the funding graph