Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Larry & Celia Moh Foundation (A North Carolina Exempt Organization)

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.8M
Granted FY2018
11
Grants FY2018
5
States reached
$1.4M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

51% of The Larry & Celia Moh Foundation (A North Carolina Exempt Organization)’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year The Larry & Celia Moh Foundation (A North Carolina Exempt Organization) named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $3M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
6
’18
3
’20
2
’21
2
’22
3
’23
1
’24
5
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$15MHealth$4.3MInternational$2.9MArts & Culture$375kOther$0
02FY2018 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $243k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.4M
$57,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$907k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UBS OPTIMUS FOUNDATION$1,425,000
CHOATE ROSEMARY HALL$757,511
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES VISION CE$250,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$75,000
KENDALL COLLEGE OF ARTDESIGN$58,711
BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION$57,000
HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY$52,680
NC STATE UNIVERSITY$40,604
INSTITUTE FOR FAMILIES$30,000
APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$24,623
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 83% of grant dollars ($19M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 17% that went abroad ($3.9M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $100k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1.8M → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $340k → 8%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $500k → 14%VOLUNTEER ALLY: $250k → 9%PROJECT ORBIS: $272k → 17%KENDALL COLLEGE OF ARTDESIGN: $59k → 11%WORLD EYE CANCER HOPE: $150k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $842k → 11%CHOATE ROSEMARY HALL: $758k → 12%NC STATE UNIVERSITY: $41k → 8%HALL OF FAME BUILDING FUND: $42k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $125k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1.8M → 22%LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $240k → 8%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $500k → 14%PROJECT ORBIS: $200k → 17%KENDALL COLLEGE OF ARTDESIGN: $29k → 11%WORLD EYE CANCER HOPE: $100k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $334k → 11%CHOATE ROSEMARY HALL: $750k → 12%NC STATE UNIVERSITY: $21k → 8%HALL OF FAME BUILDING FUND: $42k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1.7M → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $110k → 8%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $500k → 14%PROJECT ORBIS: $122k → 17%CHOATE ROSEMARY HALL: $250k → 12%HALL OF FAME BUILDING FUND: $42k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1.7M → 22%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $500k → 14%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $158k → 17%HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $53k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $1.7M → 22%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $463k → 14%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $110k → 17%HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $49k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA (WHARTON): $1.0M → 22%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $383k → 14%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $75k → 17%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES VISION CE: $250k → 14%CROSSROADS GLOBAL VILLAGE: $7k → 17%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES VISION CE: $250k → 14%CROSSROADS GLOBAL VILLAGE: $5k → 17%INSTITUTE FOR FAMILIES: $80k → 14%BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $57k → 17%INSTITUTE FOR FAMILIES: $30k → 14%BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $57k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
NC
HI
MS

Beyond the US: 17% of all-years giving ($3.9M)

4 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Hong Kong$2.8M · 2 grants
China$894k · 4 grants
United Kingdom$150k · 1 grant
Singapore$72k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 45% of The Larry & Celia Moh Foundation (A North Carolina Exempt Organization)’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Larry & Celia Moh Foundation (A North Carolina Exempt Organization)lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 17% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 17 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2018, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

$12M
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+153%

Still filing today

35%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $225k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +27%
  • NY
    New York University
    3× · 2018–2025 · $343k · revenue +59%
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR FAMILIES
    2× · 2018–2020 · $110k · revenue +29% · 40% of their budget

Funded once

  • MS
    Mississippi State University Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $24k · revenue +153%
  • SA
    SHANGHAI AMERICAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
3
Chancellor Masters & Scholars of the University of Oxford

The principal objects of the University are the advancement of learning by teaching and research, and its dissemination by every means. We work as one Oxford bringing together our staff, students and alumni, our colleges, faculties,…

—
4
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
5
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
8
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
9
Yale University

To improve the world through research, scholarship, education, preservation, and practice.

Education
10
University of Rochester

The provision of higher education in the liberal arts and sciences, medicine and dentistry, nursing and music; research; and charitable patient care services.

Education
11
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Chicago; the most unlike its peers is World Eye Cancer Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $8,680,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIACHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $1,757,511 · EducationCHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATEDTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $689,820 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVER…+4 more: $669,199 · Education+4 moreUBS OPTIMUS FOUNDATION: $2,825,000 · OtherUBS OPTIMUS FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $1,175,571 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUTUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA (WHARTON): $1,000,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA (WHARTON)CHEN YET-SEN FAMILY FOUNDATION LIMITED: $779,850 · OtherCHEN YET-SEN FAMILY FOUNDATION LIMITEDPROJECT ORBIS: $593,912 · OtherPROJECT ORBISCHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES VISION CE: $500,000 · OtherCHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES VISION …+11 more: $882,044 · Other+11 moreChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $2,846,000 · HealthChildren's Hosp…WORLD EYE CANCER HOPE: $250,000 · HealthWORLD EYE CANCE…VOLUNTEER ALLY: $250,000 · Arts & CultureMississippi State University Foundation Inc: $24,370 · Human Services
Education$11,796,530Other$7,756,377Health$3,096,000Arts & Culture$250,000Human Services$24,370

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $8,680,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $2,846,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $1,757,511 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $689,820 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $342,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER ALLY: $250,000 over 1y, 59% of budgetWORLD EYE CANCER HOPE: $250,000 over 2y, 75% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $125,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR FAMILIES: $110,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $101,699 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $58,348 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMississippi State University Foundation Inc: $24,370 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds CHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER ALLY ↗
  • Who funds WORLD EYE CANCER HOPE ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Mississippi State University Foundation Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Larry & Celia Moh Foundation (A North Carolina Exempt Organization) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Larry & Celia Moh Foundation (A North Carolina Exempt Organization). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Larry & Celia Moh Foundation (A North Carolina Exempt Organization)?

Find your warmest path to The Larry & Celia Moh Foundation (A North Carolina Exempt Organization) through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Larry & Celia Moh Foundation (A North Carolina Exempt Organization)’s filings →

More from the funding graph