Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Lanie and Ethel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$128k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$607kEducation$20k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$14,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GESELLSCHAFT DER FREUNDE VON BAYREUTH FRIENDS OF BAYREUTH SOCIETY$80,000
NEW ENGLAND CONSERVATORY$17,000
THE HUDSON REVIEW$14,000
KNEISEL HALL$8,000
NY PUBLIC LIBRARY$5,000
LA OPERA$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 45% of grant dollars ($283k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 55% that went abroad ($345k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%NEW ENGLAND CONSERVATORY: $17k → 16%LA OPERA: $18k → 14%GESELLSCHAFT DER FREUNDE VON BAYREUTH FRIENDS OF BAYREUTH SOCIETY: $130k → 18%NY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $5k → 17%WATERSHED CENTER FOR THE CERAMIC ARTS: $1k → 9%KNEISEL HALL: $8k → 11%NEW ENGLAND CONSERVATORY: $17k → 16%LA OPERA: $4k → 14%GESELLSCHAFT DER FREUNDE VON BAYREUTH FRIENDS OF BAYREUTH SOCIETY: $80k → 18%NY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $5k → 17%WATERSHED CENTER FOR THE CERAMIC ARTS: $1k → 9%KNEISEL HALL: $8k → 11%NEW ENGLAND CONSERVATORY: $17k → 16%FRIENDS OF BAYREUTH SOCIETY: $75k → 18%THE HUDSON REVIEW: $14k → 17%KNEISEL HALL: $7k → 11%NEW ENGLAND CONSERVATORY: $17k → 16%GESELLSCHAFT DER FREUNDE VON BAYREUTH FRIENDS OF BAYREUTH SOCIETY: $75k → 18%THE HUDSON REVIEW: $12k → 17%KNEISEL HALL: $7k → 11%NEW ENGLAND CONSERVATORY: $16k → 16%GESELLSCHAFT DER FREUNDE VON BAYREUTH FRIENDS OF BAYREUTH SOCIETY: $70k → 18%THE HUDSON REVIEW: $12k → 17%KNEISEL HALL: $7k → 11%NEW ENGLAND CONSERVATORY: $16k → 16%GESELLSCHAFT DER FREUNDE VON BAYREUTH FRIENDS OF BAYREUTH SOCIETY: $70k → 18%THE HUDSON REVIEW: $12k → 17%KNEISEL HALL: $7k → 11%NEW ENGLAND CONSERVATORY: $16k → 16%THE HUDSON REVIEW: $12k → 17%KNEISEL HALL: $7k → 11%THE HUDSON REVIEW: $11k → 17%THE HUDSON REVIEW: $11k → 17%YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHORUS OF NYC: $2k → 17%YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHORUS OF NYC: $2k → 17%YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHORUS OF NYC: $2k → 17%YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHORUS OF NYC: $2k → 17%YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHORUS OF NYC: $2k → 17%YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHORUS OF NYC: $2k → 17%ENTERTAINMENT COMMUNITY FUND (THE ACTORS FUND): $5k → 17%CARNEGIE HALL: $2k → 17%CARNEGIE HALL: $2k → 17%CARNEGIE HALL: $2k → 17%CARNEGIE HALL: $2k → 17%CARNEGIE HALL: $2k → 17%CARNEGIE HALL: $2k → 17%UNIQUE PROJECTS INC: $4k → 17%FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT ARTISTS INC: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 55% of all-years giving ($345k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Germany$345k · 4 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$744k · 10 repeat orgs$87k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against -23% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$744k
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
-23%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NE
    NEW ENGLAND CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $116k · revenue +42%
  • KNEISEL HALL
    7× · 2019–2025 · $50k · revenue +383%
  • EB
    EAST BLUE HILL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $15k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BAYREUTH SOCIETY
    one grant, 2024 · $75k
  • EC
    ENTERTAINMENT COMMUNITY FUND (THE ACTORS FUND)
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • UP
    UNIQUE PROJECTS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue -23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
2
Bridgehampton Chamber Music Associates Inc

The general purpose of the organization is to promote chamber music concerts to the general public.

Arts & Culture
3
Fine Arts Radio Inc

Fine Arts Radio, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit dedicated to supporting classical and classic music in Connecticut and New York

—
4
Bronx Arts Ensemble Inc

To further art education and appreciation.

Arts & Culture
5
New York Concert Artists Associates Inc

To enhance and promote musical performances of all kinds of ensembles such as orchestras, chamber ensembles, and solo recitals by providing a variety of performance opportunities and personal networks to members of musicians in new york so…

Arts & Culture
6
Bowdoin International Music Festival

The mission of the Bowdoin International Music Festival is to provide gifted young musicians from around the world with an opportunity to study with world-class artists, and to provide audiences with classical music performed to the…

Arts & Culture
7
Boston Musica Viva Inc

To broaden experience, knowledge and enjoyment of every style of new music by embracing the full range of today's compositional activity and giving voice to music that might otherwise not be heard.

—
8
The Bronx Council On the Arts Incorporated

A pioneering advocate for cultural equity, the bronx council on the arts nurtures the development of diverse artists and arts organizations and build strong cultural connections in and beyond the bronx.

Arts & Culture
9
Nantucket Arts Council Inc

Support and encourage a collaborative community of the visual, performing and literary arts through education, grants, scholarships and events.

Arts & Culture
10
Westbury Arts Inc

Westbury arts is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that delivers arts and cultural programs that connect, educate and inspire the westbury, ny community. activities include concerts, shows, exhibits, lectures, etc.

Arts & Culture
11
Community Music Center

The mission of community music center is to make high-quality music accessible to people of all ages, backgrounds, and abilities, regardless of financial means. we believe in the power of music to connect people, celebrate cultures and…

Arts & Culture
12
Cleveland Institute of Music

The cleveland institute of music's mission is to empower the world's most talented classical music students to fulfill their dreams and potential.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New England Conservatory of Music; the most unlike its peers is The Hudson Review Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GESELLSCHAFT DER FREUNDE VON BAYREUTH FRIENDS OF BAYREUTH SOCIETY: $424,549 · OtherGESELLSCHAFT DER FREUNDE VON BAYREUTH FRIENDS OF BAYREUTH SOCIETYFRIENDS OF BAYREUTH SOCIETY: $75,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF BAYREUTH SOCIETYLA OPERA: $21,500 · Other+2 more: $20,000 · OtherTHE HUDSON REVIEW INC: $84,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HUDSON REVIEW INCKNEISEL HALL: $50,200 · Arts & CultureKNEISEL HALLTHE YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHORUS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $10,500 · Arts & CultureTHE YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHO…THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION: $9,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORP…+3 more: $9,500 · Arts & Culture+3 moreNEW ENGLAND CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $116,000 · EducationNEW ENGLAND CONSE…The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $10,000 · EducationThe New York Publ…
Other$541,049Arts & Culture$163,200Education$126,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW ENGLAND CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $116,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUDSON REVIEW INC: $84,000 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetKNEISEL HALL: $50,200 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetEAST BLUE HILL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetTHE YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHORUS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $10,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION: $9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIQUE PROJECTS INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWATERSHED CENTER FOR THE CERAMIC ARTS: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT ARTISTS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUDSON REVIEW INC ↗
  • Who funds KNEISEL HALL ↗
  • Who funds EAST BLUE HILL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG PEOPLE'S CHORUS OF NEW YORK CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
  • Who funds THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIQUE PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERSHED CENTER FOR THE CERAMIC ARTS ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDEPENDENT ARTISTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Lanie and Ethel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Lanie and Ethel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • New England Conservatory of Music: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Lanie and Ethel Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Lanie and Ethel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lanie and Ethel’s filings →

More from the funding graph