Skip to content

· Public charity

The LAM Foundation

To catalyze new treatments - and ultimately a cure - for LAM by advancing research, supporting compassionate care, and amplifying the voice of women with rare diseases.

$402k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$86k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.3MScience & Tech$797kEducation$408kRecreation & Sports$331k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $272,790, the rows itemized in this filing. The $402,212 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $129,422 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $118k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $146k
$45,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cincinnati Childrens Med Cen$85,500
Northwestern University$60,000
President & Fellows of Harvar$45,000
National Tubrous Sclerosis As$43,290
University of Washington$30,000
New York Medical College$9,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Brigham & Womens Hospital: $180k → 16%University of Pennsylvania: $60k → 22%Univ California San Francisco: $25k → 10%New York Medical College: $10k → 9%University of Iowa: $10k → 15%Childrens Mercy Hospital: $45k → 15%Vanderbilt University: $50k → 14%Cincinnati Childrens Med Cen: $163k → 16%University of Washington: $90k → 9%Northwestern University: $136k → 14%TS Alliance: $60k → 8%University of Maryland: $60k → 11%Brigham & Womens Hospital: $152k → 16%University of Pennsylvania: $50k → 22%Univ California San Francisco: $25k → 10%New York Medical College: $9k → 9%Cincinnati Childrens Med Cen: $140k → 16%University of Washington: $47k → 9%Northwestern University: $60k → 14%National Tubrous Sclerosis As: $43k → 8%University of Maryland: $60k → 11%Brigham & Womens Hospital: $85k → 16%University of Pennsylvania: $38k → 22%Cincinnati Childrens Med Cen: $93k → 16%University of Washington: $30k → 9%Northwestern University: $60k → 14%University of Maryland: $60k → 11%Brigham & Womens Hospital: $57k → 16%University of Pennsylvania: $20k → 22%Cincinnati Childrens Med Cen: $86k → 16%University of Washington: $25k → 9%Northwestern University: $50k → 14%University of Maryland: $10k → 11%Brigham & Womens Hospital: $25k → 16%Cincinnati Childrens Med Cen: $67k → 16%University of Washington: $8k → 9%Northwestern University: $50k → 14%Brigham & Womens Hospital: $25k → 16%Cincinnati Childrens Med Cen: $67k → 16%Northwestern University: $35k → 14%Cincinnati Childrens Med Cen: $67k → 16%Loyola University Medical Cen: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
CA
MO
MD
TN

Grants abroad, by region: $90k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Hungary$45k · 50% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Research

United Kingdom$45k · 50% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Research

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of The LAM Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The LAM Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 9 repeat orgs$280k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$2.5M
$280k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+32%

Still filing today

56%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
    7× · 2019–2025 · $681k · revenue +37%
  • Northwestern University
    6× · 2018–2025 · $391k · revenue +33%
  • UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $190k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • JU
    Juntendo University
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • OH
    Ottawa Hospital Research Inst
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • Vanderbilt Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +74%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
2
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
3
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
4
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
5
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
6
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
7
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
8
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
11
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
12
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Medical College; the most unlike its peers is National Tuberous Sclerosis Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $522,831 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $367,059 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATIUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $200,378 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONJuntendo University: $50,000 · OtherOttawa Hospital Research Inst: $50,000 · OtherUniversity of Nottingham: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $50,000 · Other+2 more: $29,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $681,394 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CEN…NATIONAL TUBEROUS SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION: $103,290 · HealthNATIONAL TUBEROUS SCLEROSIS ASS…The Children's Mercy Hospital: $45,000 · Health+1 more: $25,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $190,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLA…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $167,945 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIV…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $145,000 · EducationPresident and Fellow…Vanderbilt University: $50,000 · EducationVanderbilt Universit…Northwestern University: $390,939 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern U…
Other$1,319,268Health$854,684Education$552,945Recreation & Sports$390,939

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $681,394 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $390,939 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $190,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $167,945 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $145,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL TUBEROUS SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION: $103,290 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetVanderbilt University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $45,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE: $19,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL TUBEROUS SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The LAM Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The LAM Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 5% of income from government
  • National Tuberous Sclerosis Association: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The LAM Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The LAM Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on LAM’s filings →

More from the funding graph