Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kleinbaum Fund Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2026still arriving
3
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$11kAnimals$3kArts & Culture$2kYouth Development$2kRecreation & Sports$1kEnvironment$1kHealth$500Education$200Other$0
02FY2026 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$864
Median grant
1
States reached
$48k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$864
SHALVA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS: $1k → 7%SHALVA: $500 → 17%RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL: $100 → 28%SAVE THE HILL COUNTRY - WIMBERLEY VALLEY WATERSHED ASSOCIATION: $1k → 10%MUSIC PEACE PROJECT: $500 → 12%BREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $10k → 14%SHARE THE HARVEST FOOD PANTRY: $300 → 13%ANIMAL RESCUE FUND: $3k → 9%ADRIANNE JACKSON: $1k → 23%LONGHOUSE RESERVE: $1k → 7%LOWER EAST SIDE GIRLS CLUB: $2k → 17%RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL: $100 → 28%LONGHOUSE RESERVE: $650 → 7%NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $500 → 17%SHARE THE HARVEST FARM: $600 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland

The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.

Animals
2
Animal Haven Inc

Animal haven is a nonprofit organization that finds homes for dogs and cats throughout the tristate area. it operates out of its adoption center in lower manhattan which has facilities for dog training and grooming as part of the adoption…

Animals
3
Field & Fork Network

Field & fork network connects communities to innovative solutions that foster a sustainable food system. the 4 areas of focus include: food access, agriculture economic development, youth development and healthy neighborhoods.

—
4
Longneck Manor Conservation Foundation

To create memorable guest experiences which promote actions to help save species, habitats, and the communities who share those same landscapes

Animals
5
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
6
Animal Resource Center

To foster access to veterinary and other care for animals

Animals
7
Farm Sanctuary Inc

We pursue bold solutions to end animal agriculture and foster just and compassionate vegan living through education and policy advocacy.

Animals
8
Land Conservancy of Ridgefield Inc

The Land Conservancy's vision is a beautiful, historic New England town rich in diverse wildlife, scenic beauty, and natural resources that will enhance the lives of its citizens. These goals are accomplished through:* Research:…

Environment
9
Michigan Anti-Cruelty Society

To maintain and operate a hospital, ambulance and veterinary services for the care of animals. the maintenance and operation of kennels and suitable chambers for the humane destruction of wounded animals.

Animals
10
Hallie Hill Animal Sanctuary F/K/a Hallie Hill Inc

To provide a compassionate safe-haven with quality food and medical care for dogs and cats and a temporary home for those able to be adopted and a forever home for those in need.

Animals
11
The Lincoln Park Conservancy Inc

The primary program of the lincoln park conservancy is to grow a sustainable organic garden.

Arts & Culture
12
Red Dog Farm Animal Rescue Network

Rdf provides superior rescue care and foster housing to diverse domestic and exotic animals with a goal of finding them forever homes.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Animal Rescue Fund of the Hamptons Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionBREAD FOR THE CITY INCSHARE THE HARVEST FARM INC FKA FOOD PANTRY FARM INCORPORATED: $600 · Food & NutritionSHARE THE HARVEST FARM INC FKA FOOD PANTRY FARM I…Individual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…SAVE THE HILL COUNTRY - WIMBERLEY VALLEY WATERSHED ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · OtherSAVE THE HILL COUNTRY - …Individual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…Individual grant recipient: $864 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…SHALVA: $500 · OtherSHALVAMUSIC PEACE PROJECT: $500 · OtherMUSIC PEACE PROJECTSHARE THE HARVEST FOOD PANTRY: $300 · OtherSHARE THE HARVEST FOOD P…ANIMAL RESCUE FUND INC: $3,454 · AnimalsANIMAL RESCUE FUND I…ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS INC: $1,000 · AnimalsANIMAL RESCUE FUND O…LONGHOUSE RESERVE: $1,650 · EducationRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $200 · EducationTHE LOWER EAST SIDE GIRLS CLUB OF NEW YORK INC: $1,650 · Youth DevelopmentNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $500 · Health
Food & Nutrition$10,600Other$5,164Animals$4,454Education$1,850Youth Development$1,650Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE LOWER EAST SIDE GIRLS CLUB OF NEW YORK INC: $1,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLONGHOUSE RESERVE: $1,650 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSHARE THE HARVEST FARM INC FKA FOOD PANTRY FARM INCORPORATED: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kleinbaum Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kleinbaum Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Kleinbaum Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Kleinbaum Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kleinbaum’s filings →

    More from the funding graph