· Private foundation
The Kilgore Family Foundation Allen Marylou Kristina Mark & Michele
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 62% of THE KILGORE FAMILY FOUNDATION ALLEN MARYLOU KRISTINA MARK & MICHELE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $270k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $115k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DOCTOR'S WITHOUT BORDERS | $65,000 |
| SAINT THOMAS AQUINAS | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $35,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCH | $30,000 |
| MAYO CLINIC | $25,000 |
| CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| INTO THE LIGHT | $20,000 |
| NORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK | $20,000 |
| COMPASSION HOUSE | $20,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITES OF ARKANSAS | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| CS LEWIS INSTITUTE | $15,000 |
| CROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACH | $15,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $196k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC5× · 2020–2024 · $210k · revenue +39%- NANORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK5× · 2020–2024 · $71k · revenue +12%
- CLCS Lewis Institute2× · 2020–2024 · $18k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- UFUCA FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $100k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSASone grant, 2018 · $50k
- ACARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDAone grant, 2017 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization and its volunteers served as advocates for abused and neglected children. the nationwide organization has helped more than two million children.
The northeast arkansas children's advocacy center provides a child appropriate, safe setting for children to tell their story of abuse.
To provide a safe have, high quality care, and hope for the future to chidren who have been abandoned, abused, or neglected.
The mission of the children's advocacy network is to help heal and champion abused and neglected children throughout central louisiana
Child safe of central missouri's mission is to respond to and prevent child abuse by providing advocacy, support, and resources to children who are alleged victims of abuse and other traumatic crimes, and to their non-offending family…
The organization and its volunteers serve as advocates for abused and neglected children.
Provide services for abused children
The cac provides intervention services for children who are victims of severe abuse and advocacy services to their non offending caregivers. this includes forensic interviews, medical exams, therapy, and prevention education. the cac also…
Advocating for the development and implementation of data-driven public policy that improves child well-being in arkansas, with a focus on economic security, education, health, early childhood, child welfare, juvenile justice, and racial…
We help children who have been abused, assaulted, or been witness to a crime. the children's advocacy center of southeastern indiana is a child-friendly nonprofit corporation created to minimize the trauma suffered by victims of child abuse
Baton rouge children's advocacy center serves abused children and their non-offending family members. services include forensic interviews, therapy services, and a family advocacy support program.
To protect and uphold the rights of children when wrongs have been committed against them, to help abused or neglected children have safe permanent homes where they can thrive, to act as a powerful voice in these children's best interests…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Advocacy Center of Benton County and the most unlike its peers is Cs Lewis Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST ARKANSAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds JUDEVINE INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds INTO THE LIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds CS Lewis Institute ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST ARKANSAS WOMEN'S SHELTER ↗
- Who funds SAVING GRACE ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SINGLE PARENT SCHOLARSHIP FUND OF NORTHWEST ARKANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds RESTORATION MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF BENTON CO INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF BENTON COUNTY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Wal-Mart Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Walton Family Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Excellerate Foundation Charitable Support · The Schmieding Foundation · Alice L Walton Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · McKinney C & a Charitable Trust · Willard & Pat Walker Charitable Foundation Inc · Nabholz Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Kilgore Family Foundation Allen Marylou Kristina Mark & Michele funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Kilgore Family Foundation Allen Marylou Kristina Mark & Michele?
Find your warmest path to The Kilgore Family Foundation Allen Marylou Kristina Mark & Michele through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.