Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Kiita Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$866k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$449k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$993kPhilanthropy$573kHuman Services$441kFood & Nutrition$419kCrime & Legal$325kCommunity Improvement$218kYouth Development$152kAnimals$130kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $266k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $126k
  • $250k+1 grant · $449k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$448,940
BLOOM365$70,000
WHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$56,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO$45,000
AZ FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOUN$40,000
ASU FOUNDATION$35,000
SEEDSPOT$30,000
NORTH VALLEY FOOD BANK$25,000
SOUNDS ACADEMY$25,000
DENVER UNIVERSITY$20,000
INTEGRATED FAMILY COMMUNITY SERVICE$15,000
SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS$11,000
FREE ARTS$10,000
HATCH$10,000
PHOENIX CODING ACADEMY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $614k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SUPPORT MY CLUB: $25k → 11%NORTH VALLEY FOOD BANK: $100k → 11%SUPPORT MY CLUB: $25k → 11%NORTH VALLEY FOOD BANK: $85k → 11%NORTH VALLEY FOOD BANK: $75k → 11%NORTH VALLEY FOOD BANK: $75k → 11%CLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER: $5k → 12%NORTH VALLEY FOOD BANK: $44k → 11%NORTH VALLEY FOOD BANK: $25k → 11%INTEGRATED FAMILY COMMUNITY SERVICE: $15k → 8%INTEGRATED FAMILY COMMUNITY SERVICE: $8k → 8%INTEGRATED FAMILY COMMUNITY SERVICE: $5k → 8%SUPPORT MY CLUB: $2k → 11%SUPPORT MY CLUB: $50k → 11%SUPPORT MY CLUB: $25k → 11%RANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%WELCOM TO AMERICA PROJECT: $25k → 11%WELCOM TO AMERICA PROJECT: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
NY
MA
CA
CO
AZ
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 34 repeat orgs$295k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
34

Total granted

$4.2M
$255k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+74%

Still filing today

53%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureCrime & LegalPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NV
    NORTH VALLEY FOOD BANK
    6× · 2019–2024 · $404k · revenue +143%
  • ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $385k · revenue +196%
  • BI
    BLOOM365 INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $300k · revenue +130%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ball Charter Schools (Val Vista)

Arizona ball charter schools provides a personalized education to all students emphasizing comprehensive academic excellence in a safe, nurturing environment through partnering parents, students and staff.

Education
2
International School of Arizona

Our mission is to provide a progressive international education and advanced multilingual academics in a safe, diverse, and nurturing environment. our innovative and individualized approach to learning prepares highly motivated students…

Education
3
Ball Charter Schools(Dobson)

Arizona ball charter schools provides a personalized education to all students emphasizing comprehensive academic excellence in a safe, nurturing environment through partnering parents, students and staff.

Education
4
Arizona Educational Foundation Inc

To celebrate excellence and cultivate opportunity in pk-12th grade arizona public education.

—
5
Arizona Leads

We facilitate effective, bipartisan partnerships needed to achieve educational excellence and scale success across arizona's public schools - both district and charter.

Education
6
Tucson Family Food Project Inc

The mission of the tucson family food project is to provide meals for children who are struggling with food insecurity, while teaching them how to cook food for themselves in their own homes.

Food & Nutrition
7
Education Forward Arizona

To advocate for and act on education improvements that advance the quality of life for all arizonans.

—
8
Center for the Future of Arizona

Bringing arizonans together to create a stronger and brighter future for our state.

Community Improvement
9
Academic Opportunity of Arizona

Academic opportunity of arizona is a school tuition organization. as a local 501c3 non-profit, we provide scholarships and support for k-12th grade children living with disabilities and low-income hardships. our 360 degree approach…

Education
10
Dc Bilingual Public Charter School

The mission of dc bilingual public charter school is to create a learning community that ensures high academic achievement for all students in both spanish and english, develops leadership, and values all cultures.

Education
11
Tucson Values Teachers

To elevate the teaching profession in southern arizona by empowering and celebrating prek-12 teacher excellence through community engagement and investment.

Employment
12
Fountain Valley School of Colorado

Fountain valley school of colorado provides a transformative curriculum in a supportive environment where students are challenged to think critically, become leaders, and live by our core values: courage, compassion, curiosity,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Donorschooseorg; the most unlike its peers is Every Child Reading. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/39
Grantees still filing
29/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,207,440 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNADI- SALVATION ARMY: $165,000 · OtherNADI- SALVATION ARMYNATIONAL ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $130,000 · OtherAZ FRIENDS OF FOSTER CHILDREN FOUN: $115,000 · Other+41 more: $845,150 · Other+41 moreARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $385,000 · EducationARIZONA STATE UN…UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $123,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CO…KENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $70,000 · EducationKENT DENVER COUN…UNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $60,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DE…BALSZ COMMUNITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $35,000 · Education+6 more: $48,104 · Education+6 moreNORTH VALLEY FOOD BANK: $403,779 · Human ServicesNORTH VALLEY …SUPPORT MY CLUB: $127,230 · Human ServicesSUPPORT MY CL…THE WELCOME TO AMERICA PROJECT: $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE WELCOME T…Integrated Family Community Services: $27,500 · Human Services+2 more: $10,686 · Human ServicesARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $243,500 · PhilanthropyARIZONA COMMU…SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS TUCSON: $237,000 · PhilanthropySOCIAL VENTUR…WHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $77,000 · PhilanthropyWHITEFISH COM…+1 more: $15,000 · PhilanthropyBLOOM365 INC: $300,340 · Crime & Legal+2 more: $15,000 · Crime & LegalSEED SPOT: $217,600 · Community ImprovementSOUNDS ACADEMY: $65,000 · Arts & CultureHATCH: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PHOENIX: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,462,590Education$721,604Human Services$614,195Philanthropy$572,500Crime & Legal$315,340Community Improvement$217,600Arts & Culture$82,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH VALLEY FOOD BANK: $403,779 over 6y, 13% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $385,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOM365 INC: $300,340 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $243,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS TUCSON: $237,000 over 7y, 8.6% of budgetSEED SPOT: $217,600 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetNATIONAL ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $130,000 over 2y, 65% of budgetSUPPORT MY CLUB: $127,230 over 5y, 15% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $123,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWHITEFISH LEGACY PARTNERS INC: $80,000 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetWHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $77,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFEEDING MATTERS INC: $75,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetKENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $70,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSOUNDS ACADEMY: $65,000 over 5y, 6.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WELCOME TO AMERICA PROJECT: $45,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetSTEPS OF LOVE: $40,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetNEW WAY ACADEMY: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBALSZ COMMUNITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 7y, 17% of budgetIntegrated Family Community Services: $27,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetVILLA MONTESSORI INC: $22,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSTACY FUSON FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREE ARTS FOR ABUSED CHILDREN OF ARIZONA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHATCH: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetEVERY CHILD READING: $10,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetVISTA COLLEGE PREPARATORY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTREASURES 4 TEACHERS INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOLIBRI CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $6,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetRANCHO FELIZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $5,686 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL OF WHITEFISH: $5,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetARIZONA LATINO LEADERS IN EDUCATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREAD BETTER BE BETTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PHOENIX: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRINK LITERACY PROJECT: $2,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetDESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $604 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH VALLEY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BLOOM365 INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS TUCSON ↗
  • Who funds SEED SPOT ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSISTANCE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds SUPPORT MY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WHITEFISH LEGACY PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITEFISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING MATTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds KENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SOUNDS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds THE WELCOME TO AMERICA PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds STEPS OF LOVE ↗
  • Who funds NEW WAY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds BALSZ COMMUNITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Integrated Family Community Services ↗
  • Who funds VILLA MONTESSORI INC ↗
  • Who funds STACY FUSON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ32.8× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · The Armstrong Family Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Burton Family Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · John F Long Foundation Inc · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · American Express Foundation · The Steele Foundation Inc · Fiesta Events Inc · Valley of the Sun United Way · The Bob & Renee Parsons Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Kiita Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Kiita Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Kiita Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Kiita Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kiita’s filings →

    More from the funding graph