Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Kate Fisher Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$99k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Housing & Shelter$159kAnimals$84kPhilanthropy$52kRecreation & Sports$35kEducation$34kYouth Development$10kCivil Rights$5kReligion$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $81k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$678k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAVEN FOR HOPE$35,000
CEASAR KLEBERG WILDLIFE RES INST$25,000
SOUTH TEXAS CHARITY WEEKEND$21,425
ST LUKES FUND$5,000
CAMP BARNABAS$5,000
THE MIRACLE LEAGUE OF SAN ANTONIO$5,000
Individual grant recipient$1,150
PORT ARANSAS WILDLIFE RESCUE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%The Blind Eye Project: $3k → 9%THE BLIND EYE PROJECT: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$298k · 7 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
9

Total granted

$298k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-74%
-5%

Still filing today

43%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyEducationHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    Haven for Hope of Bexar County
    5× · 2020–2024 · $159k · revenue +6%
  • CK
    CEASAR KLEBERG WILDLIFE RES INST
    3× · 2022–2024 · $83k
  • AE
    Aggie Excellence Fund
    2× · 2020–2021 · $30k

Funded once

  • TC
    TEXAS CAVALIERS CHARITABLE FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $16k · revenue -5%
  • ST
    SOUTH TEXAS CHARITY WEEK
    one grant, 2022 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
2/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CEASAR KLEBERG WILDLIFE RES INST — $83,225 · OtherCEASAR KLEBERG WILDLIFE RES INSTAggie Excellence Fund — $30,000 · OtherAggie Excellence FundTEXAS CAVALIERS CHARITABLE FUND — $25,000 · OtherTEXAS CAVALIERS CHARITABLE FUNDSOUTH TEXAS CHARITY WEEK — $15,000 · OtherSOUTH TEXAS CHARITY WEEKCAMP BARNABAS — $10,000 · OtherCAMP BARNABAS+7 more — $15,050 · Other+7 moreHaven for Hope of Bexar County — $159,379 · Housing & ShelterHaven for Hope of Bexar CountySouth Texas Charity Weekend Inc — $21,425 · PhilanthropySouth Texa…UNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY — $16,019 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY…The Miracle League of San Antonio Inc — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsThe Blind Eye Project Inc — $3,500 · Human ServicesTexas A&M Foundation — $2,500 · EducationALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Education
Other$178,275Housing & Shelter$159,379Philanthropy$37,444Recreation & Sports$10,000Human Services$3,500Education$3,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHaven for Hope of Bexar County — $159,379 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSouth Texas Charity Weekend Inc — $21,425 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY — $16,019 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Miracle League of San Antonio Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetThe Blind Eye Project Inc — $3,500 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Haven for Hope of Bexar County
  • Who funds South Texas Charity Weekend Inc
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY
  • Who funds The Miracle League of San Antonio Inc
  • Who funds The Blind Eye Project Inc
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation
  • Who funds ALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Kate Fisher Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph