Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Kahn Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$248kInternational$16kEducation$8kReligion$7kHuman Services$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kScience & Tech$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$4,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$639k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WHITTINGHAM CANCER CENTER$12,000
THE JOHNS HOPKINS WILMER EYE INSTITUTE$10,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$5,000
AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION$4,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$1,000
THE V FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH$1,000
COPE FOUNDATION$1,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COPE FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%COPE FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%COPE FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%COPE FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%COPE FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
CT
CA
VA
MD
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$292k · 15 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
0

Total granted

$292k
$0

Still filing today

73%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalReligionHuman ServicesEducationPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +206%
  • DE
    DISCOVERY EYE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2019 · $11k · revenue +48%
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +4%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

    The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

    Health
    2
    Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
    Health
    3
    Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

    Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

    Health
    4
    Target Als Foundation Inc

    Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

    Education
    5
    Lung Cancer Research Foundation

    The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

    Health
    6
    The Glaucoma Foundation Inc

    The glaucoma foundation, inc. is an international not-for-profit organization dedicated to eradicating glaucoma, the leading cause of preventable blindness. the strategy to achieve this goal is two-fold: raise public awareness concerning…

    Health
    7
    Doheny Eye Institute

    To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

    8
    The Translational Genomics Research Institute

    Please see schedule o

    Health
    9
    Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

    Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

    Health
    10
    Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

    The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

    Human Services
    11
    The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

    Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

    12
    New York Genome Center Inc

    Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

    Health

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coast Guard Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cope Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    12/12
    Grantees still filing
    11/12
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    THE JOHNS HOPKINS WILMER EYE INSTITUTE — $70,000 · OtherTHE JOHNS HOPKINS WILMER EYE INSTITUTEMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $57,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTERWHITTINGHAM CANCER CENTER — $51,000 · OtherWHITTINGHAM CANCER CENTERDISCOVERY EYE FOUNDATION — $11,000 · OtherDISCOVERY EYE FOUNDATION+1 more — $4,000 · OtherAmerican Diabetes Association — $37,200 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Asso…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $10,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED IN…THE V FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATIONGLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $2,000 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $16,000 · InternationalSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $6,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $2,000 · EducationHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $6,800 · ReligionCOPE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 · Public BenefitLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC — $2,000 · Science & Tech
    Other$193,000Health$59,200International$16,000Education$8,000Religion$6,800Human Services$5,000Public Benefit$4,000Science & Tech$2,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmerican Diabetes Association — $37,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDISCOVERY EYE FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $6,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOPE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds American Diabetes Association
    • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    • Who funds DISCOVERY EYE FOUNDATION
    • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION
    • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
    • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    • Who funds COPE FOUNDATION INC
    • Who funds COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC
    • Who funds GLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    • Who funds LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC
    • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization The Kahn Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      1get no government money at all
      2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to The Kahn Foundation?

      Find your warmest path to The Kahn Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph