Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

John Huntington Fund for Education

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$813k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$22MCommunity Improvement$1.3MArts & Culture$1.0MHealth$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $27k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $605k
  • $250k+6 grants · $2.7M
$346,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND$812,775
JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY$401,000
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY$400,000
MAGNET$390,000
BALDWIN WALLACE UNIVERSITY$350,000
URSULINE COLLEGE$346,000
CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ART$160,000
CENTRAL SCHOOL OF PRACTICAL NURSING$150,000
NEW BRIDGE CLEVELAND CENTER$120,000
TRI-C$100,000
EDWINS$75,000
MATCHING GRANT PROGRAM$26,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%MAGNET: $390k → 17%BALDWIN WALLACE UNIVERSITY: $350k → 17%BALDWIN WALLACE UNIVERSITY: $350k → 17%BALDWIN WALLACE UNIVERSITY: $300k → 17%BALDWIN WALLACE UNIVERSITY: $300k → 17%MAGNET: $250k → 17%BALDWIN WALLACE UNIVERSITY: $250k → 17%MAGNET: $240k → 17%BALDWIN WALLACE UNIVERSITY: $206k → 17%MAGNET: $150k → 17%JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY: $404k → 17%JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY: $401k → 17%JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY: $385k → 17%JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY: $385k → 17%JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY: $361k → 17%JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY: $361k → 17%JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY: $360k → 17%JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY: $350k → 17%COLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND: $813k → 17%COLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND: $800k → 17%COLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND: $769k → 17%COLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND: $769k → 17%COLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND: $705k → 17%COLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND: $705k → 17%COLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND: $683k → 17%COLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND: $625k → 17%CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ART: $160k → 17%CENTRAL SCHOOL OF PRACTICAL NURSING: $150k → 17%PWA SPIRIT OF GENEROSITY GRANT: $400k → 17%NOTRE DAME COLLEGE: $200k → 17%NOTRE DAME COLLEGE: $170k → 17%NOTRE DAME COLLEGE: $170k → 17%URSULINE COLLEGE: $346k → 17%URSULINE COLLEGE: $315k → 17%URSULINE COLLEGE: $315k → 17%URSULINE COLLEGE: $315k → 17%URSULINE COLLEGE: $289k → 17%URSULINE COLLEGE: $289k → 17%URSULINE COLLEGE: $275k → 17%URSULINE COLLEGE: $250k → 17%CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $884k → 17%CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $842k → 17%CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $765k → 17%CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $700k → 17%CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $700k → 17%CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $600k → 17%CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $500k → 17%CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $400k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$24M · 16 repeat orgs$575k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
3

Total granted

$24M
$500k

Still filing today

63%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CN
    COLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5.9M · revenue +214%
  • CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5.4M · revenue +50%
  • John Carroll University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • PS
    PWA SPIRIT OF GENEROSITY GRANT
    one grant, 2023 · $400k
  • BW
    BALDWIN WALLACE UNIVERSITY - STEM
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • UH
    UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS - ANN PINKERTON RANNEY ENDOWED FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
5
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
6
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
7
The College of Wooster

The college of wooster is a community of independent minds, working together to prepare students to become leaders of character and influence in an interdependent global community. (continued on schedule o)we engage motivated students in a…

Education
8
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

9
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
10
Walsh University Inc

Walsh university is an independent, coeducational catholic, liberal arts and sciences institution dedicated to educating its students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education with an international perspective…

Education
11
Carleton College

See schedule o.founded in 1866, carleton college is a private, coeducational liberal arts college of 2,007 students located in the historic river town of northfield, minnesota. nationally recognized as the nation's top college for…

Education
12
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Cleveland Institute of Art and the most unlike its peers is Manufacturing Advocacy & Growth Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND INC — $5,868,525 · EducationCOLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND INCCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $5,391,100 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITYJohn Carroll University — $3,007,250 · EducationJohn Carroll UniversityURSULINE COLLEGE — $2,393,500 · EducationURSULINE COLLEGEBaldwin Wallace University — $2,036,800 · EducationBaldwin Wallace UniversityCENTRAL SCHOOL OF PRACTICAL NURSING INC — $1,093,000 · EducationNOTRE DAME COLLEGE — $1,064,325 · EducationTHE CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ART — $1,006,000 · EducationPWA SPIRIT OF GENEROSITY GRANT — $400,000 · OtherTRI-C — $325,000 · OtherCOLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND - ADULT LEARNER PROGRAM — $290,000 · OtherNEW BRIDGE CLEVELAND CENTER — $180,000 · OtherMATCHING GRANT PROGRAM — $154,500 · OtherEDWINS — $75,000 · Other+4 more — $162,826 · OtherMANUFACTURING ADVOCACY & GROWTH NETWORK INC — $1,130,000 · Community ImprovementFUND FOR OUR ECONOMIC FUTURE OF NORTHEAST OHIO — $166,667 · Community Improvement
Education$21,860,500Other$1,587,326Community Improvement$1,296,667

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND INC — $5,868,525 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $5,391,100 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJohn Carroll University — $3,007,250 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetURSULINE COLLEGE — $2,393,500 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetBaldwin Wallace University — $2,036,800 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMANUFACTURING ADVOCACY & GROWTH NETWORK INC — $1,130,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetCENTRAL SCHOOL OF PRACTICAL NURSING INC — $1,093,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetNOTRE DAME COLLEGE — $1,064,325 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ART — $1,006,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetFUND FOR OUR ECONOMIC FUTURE OF NORTHEAST OHIO — $166,667 over 5y, 2.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND INC
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds John Carroll University
  • Who funds URSULINE COLLEGE
  • Who funds Baldwin Wallace University
  • Who funds MANUFACTURING ADVOCACY & GROWTH NETWORK INC
  • Who funds CENTRAL SCHOOL OF PRACTICAL NURSING INC
  • Who funds NOTRE DAME COLLEGE
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ART
  • Who funds FUND FOR OUR ECONOMIC FUTURE OF NORTHEAST OHIO

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozick Family FoundationOH15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozick Family Foundation · Burton D Morgan Foundation Inc · The Cleveland Foundation · John P Murphy Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of Cleveland · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization John Huntington Fund for Education funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John Huntington Fund for Education?

    Find your warmest path to John Huntington Fund for Education through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph