Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Jennie and Matthew Hantzmon Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$864k
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$508k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 96% of THE JENNIE AND MATTHEW HANTZMON FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k23 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $192k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $134k
  • $250k+1 grant · $508k
$2,400
Median grant
12
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
7 SAINTS DONOR ADVISED FUND$507,500
ST THOMAS AQUINAS CATHOLIC CHURCH$133,950
CHESTERTON ACADEMY$35,000
MILLER CENTER$30,000
DOMINICAN FRIARS FOUNDATION$20,000
JOURNEY OF AWESOMENESS$20,000
ST ANSELM INSTITUTE$15,000
THE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY STUDIES$15,000
OUR LADY OF THE ANGELS MONASTERY$15,000
EQUESTRIAN ORDER OF THE HOLY SEPULCHRE$12,000
CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF RICHMOND$10,000
RESTON STUDY CENTER$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$6,000
THINK AGAIN$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHARLOTTESVILLE ABUNDANT LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $7k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
IL
NY
MA
OH
CT
RI
CA
UT
MO
VA
MD
DE
TN
NC
DC
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 38 repeat orgs$709k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

38 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
31

Total granted

$1.4M
$146k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+33%

Still filing today

29%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $563k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionCivil RightsInternationalRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    THE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY STUDIES
    3× · 2021–2024 · $26k · revenue +89%
  • WI
    WORLDSERVE INTERNATIONAL
    3× · 2018–2020 · $23k · revenue +218%
  • TJ
    THE JEFFERSON COUNCIL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • LO
    LIVING OUR MISSION CAMPAIGN - CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF RICHMOND
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • ST
    ST THOMAS AQUINAS COVID RELIEF
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
2
Jefferson Scholars Foundation

The jefferson scholars foundation (foundation) provides academic merit-based scholarship, fellowship and professorship support to students and faculty at the university of virginia (uva).

Philanthropy
3
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
4
Virginia Tech Foundation Inc

Virginia tech foundation, inc. (vtf) is a virginia nonstock corporation established in 1948 for the sole purpose of managing virginia tech's endowment to advance virginia tech's mission and its strategic priorities.

Education
5
Vcu Investment Management Company

To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…

Education
6
Marymount University

Marymount is a nationally ranked comprehensive catholic university, guided by the traditions of the religious of the sacred heart of mary, that emphasizes intellectual curiosity, service to others, and a global perspective. a marymount…

7
Washington University of Virginia

Provides seminary, under-graduate, graduate, doctoral, and other continuing education programs

8
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
9
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
10
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
11
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Virginia Student Aid Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Haven Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyGovernment Accountability R…Cancer Support OrganizationsVeteran Support ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…Pregnancy Support ServicesSubstance Abuse TreatmentHospice Care ServicesPublic University Foundatio…Community FoundationsChristian Youth CampsSenior Support ServicesIndependent K-8 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Food Pantries & AssistanceChristian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr18%16%10–20yr14%20%20–35yr15%32%35–55yr15%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr18%38%10–20yr14%42%20–35yr15%7%35–55yr15%11%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/31
the rest of the field
13%
6,445/50,437

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
20/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

7 SAINTS DONOR ADVISED FUND — $507,500 · Other7 SAINTS DONOR ADVISED FUNDST THOMAS AQUINAS CATHOLIC CHURCH — $487,980 · OtherST THOMAS AQUINAS CATHOLIC CHURCHCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF RICHMOND — $315,500 · OtherCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF RICHMONDLIVING OUR MISSION CAMPAIGN - CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF RICHMOND — $100,000 · OtherST ANSELM INSTITUTE — $85,000 · OtherDOMINICAN FRIARS FOUNDATION — $81,875 · OtherJourney of Awesomeness Incorporated — $79,595 · OtherMILLER CENTER — $78,500 · Other+60 more — $306,750 · Other+60 moreTHE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY STUDIES — $26,000 · EducationDaraja Education Fund — $1,000 · Education+4 more — $1,765 · EducationWORLDSERVE INTERNATIONAL — $22,750 · InternationalTHE HAITIAN PROJECT INC — $4,900 · InternationalRESTON STUDY CENTER INC — $10,000 · ReligionTHE BRIDGE MINISTRY INC — $500 · ReligionFOUNDATION THINKAGAIN — $10,000 · HealthCHARLOTTESVILLE ABUNDANT LIFE MINISTRIES — $7,330 · Human ServicesTHE JEFFERSON COUNCIL — $2,000 · Civil RightsBIKING FOR BABIES — $515 · Civil Rights
Other$2,042,700Education$28,765International$27,650Religion$10,500Health$10,000Human Services$7,330Civil Rights$2,515

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJourney of Awesomeness Incorporated — $79,595 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY STUDIES — $26,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetWORLDSERVE INTERNATIONAL — $22,750 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRESTON STUDY CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFOUNDATION THINKAGAIN — $10,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetCHARLOTTESVILLE ABUNDANT LIFE MINISTRIES — $7,330 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HAITIAN PROJECT INC — $4,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEFFERSON COUNCIL — $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $1,040 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDaraja Education Fund — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $865 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HAVEN INC — $765 over 1y, 18% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST ANNE'S-BELFIELD INC — $700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBIKING FOR BABIES — $515 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $513 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIDGE MINISTRY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC — $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP HOLIDAY TRAILS — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLOTTESVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHyde School — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC — $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Journey of Awesomeness Incorporated
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY STUDIES
  • Who funds WORLDSERVE INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds RESTON STUDY CENTER INC
  • Who funds FOUNDATION THINKAGAIN
  • Who funds CHARLOTTESVILLE ABUNDANT LIFE MINISTRIES
  • Who funds CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE HAITIAN PROJECT INC
  • Who funds THE JEFFERSON COUNCIL
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charlottesville Area Community FoundationVA19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · The Watterson Foundation · The Charles Fund Inc · The J & E Berkley Foundation · S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation · The Community Foundation Inc · The Better Living Foundation · Quantitative Foundation · Manning Family Foundation · Perry Foundation Inc · The Genan Foundation · Caplin Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Jennie and Matthew Hantzmon Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph