Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jeffrey Frank Wacks Memorial Fund Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$93kEducation$50kArts & Culture$35kPhilanthropy$32k
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$31,632
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE WALTER & ALICE GORHAM FOUNDATION$31,632
BARRINGTON STAGE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%BARRINGTON STAGE: $25k → 12%DAMON RUNYAN CANCER CENTER: $13k → 17%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%THE WALTER & ALICE GORHAM FOUNDATION: $32k → 4%JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BERKSHIRES: $100 → 7%SUMMIT MEDICAL GROUP FOUNDATION: $40k → 10%BARRINGTON STAGE: $10k → 12%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%SUMMIT MEDICAL GROUP FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $15k → 11%SUMMIT MEDICAL GROUP FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%SUMMIT MEDICAL GROUP FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%SUMMIT MEDICAL GROUP FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%SUMMIT MEDICAL GROUP FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYBARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC: $35,000 · EducationBARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INCThe Summit Medical Group Foundation Inc: $80,000 · HealthThe Summit Medical Group Foundation IncWALTER F & ALICE GORHAM FOUNDATION INC: $31,632 · OtherWALTER F & ALICE GORHAM …DAMON RUNYAN CANCER CENTER: $12,913 · OtherDAMON RUNYAN CANCER CENT…JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BERKSHIRES: $100 · Philanthropy
Education$85,000Health$80,000Other$44,545Philanthropy$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Summit Medical Group Foundation Inc: $80,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWALTER F & ALICE GORHAM FOUNDATION INC: $31,632 over 1y, 99% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BERKSHIRES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jeffrey Frank Wacks Memorial Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jeffrey Frank Wacks Memorial Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Jeffrey Frank Wacks Memorial Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Jeffrey Frank Wacks Memorial Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jeffrey Frank Wacks Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph