Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jean Harvey Williams Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Safety & Disaster$141kHuman Services$39kEducation$26kReligion$16kRecreation & Sports$14kArts & Culture$13kCrime & Legal$6kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$95k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
GRIFTON RESCUE SQUAD$10,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
GRIFTON MISSION MINISTRIES$4,000
GRIFTON SHAD FESTIVAL$3,000
HISTORICAL MUSEUM & INDIAN VILLAGE$2,000
JOHN LAWSON LEGACY DAYS$2,000
RHEMS FIRE AND RESCUE INC$2,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$2,000
GRIFTON PUBLIC LIBRARY BOOK TRUST$2,000
AYDEN-GRIFTON HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
GRIFTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$1,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$1,000
REAL CRISIS CENTER$1,000
CENTER FOR FAMILY VIOLENCE PREV$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 48% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 16%GRIFTON FIRE DEPARTMENT: $10k → 12%THE SALVATION ARMY: $1k → 14%GRIFTON RESCUE SQUAD: $10k → 12%GRIFTON FIRE DEPARTMENT: $10k → 12%GRIFTON RESCUE SQUAD: $10k → 12%GRIFTON FIRE DEPARTMENT: $10k → 12%GRIFTON RESCUE SQUAD: $10k → 12%GRIFTON RESCUE SQUAD: $10k → 12%GRIFTON FIRE DEPARTMENT: $10k → 12%GRIFTON RESCUE SQUAD: $5k → 12%GRIFTON FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5k → 12%AYDEN-GRIFTON HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 20%GRIFTON RESCUE SQUAD: $4k → 12%AYDEN-GRIFTON HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 20%GRIFTON RESCUE SQUAD: $4k → 12%AYDEN-GRIFTON HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 20%GRIFTON FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 12%AYDEN-GRIFTON HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 20%GRIFTON FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 12%GRIFTON FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 12%GRIFTON FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 12%GRIFTON RESCUE SQUAD: $2k → 12%GRIFTON PUBLIC LIBRARY BOOK TRUST: $2k → 12%GRIFTON PUBLIC LIBRARY BOOK TRUST: $2k → 12%GRIFTON PUBLIC LIBRARY BOOK TRUST: $2k → 12%GRIFTON PUBLIC LIBRARY BOOK TRUST: $2k → 12%GRIFTON MISSION MINISTRIES: $4k → 20%HUGO FIRE DEPT: $4k → 20%HUGO FIRE DEPT: $4k → 20%HUGO FIRE DEPT: $4k → 20%GRIFTON MISSION MINISTRIES: $4k → 20%GRIFTON MISSION MINISTRIES: $4k → 20%HUGO FIRE DEPT: $4k → 20%GRIFTON MISSION MINISTRIES: $4k → 20%GRIFTON SHAD FESTIVAL: $3k → 20%GRIFTON SHAD FESTIVAL: $3k → 20%GRIFTON SHAD FESTIVAL: $3k → 20%GRIFTON SHAD FESTIVAL: $3k → 20%HISTORICAL MUSEUM & INDIAN VILLAGE: $2k → 20%JOHN LAWSON LEGACY DAYS: $2k → 20%HISTORICAL MUSEUM & INDIAN VILLAGE: $2k → 20%GRIFTON MISSION MINISTRIES: $2k → 20%HISTORICAL MUSEUM & INDIAN VILLAGE: $2k → 20%JOHN LAWSON LEGACY DAYS: $2k → 20%HISTORICAL MUSEUM & INDIAN VILLAGE: $2k → 20%JOHN LAWSON LEGACY DAYS: $2k → 20%HUGO FIRE DEPT: $2k → 20%JOHN LAWSON LEGACY DAYS: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$261k · 17 repeat orgs$100 to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
1

Total granted

$261k
$100

Still filing today

24%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHousing & ShelterArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GR
    GRIFTON RESCUE SQUAD INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $57k · revenue +17%
  • GM
    GRIFTON MISSION MINISTRIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +4%
  • GS
    GRIFTON SHAD FESTIVAL INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $14k · revenue +171%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $54,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE SALVATION ARMY: $14,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYGRIFTON PUBLIC LIBRARY BOOK TRUST: $11,000 · OtherGRIFTON PUBLIC LIBRARY BOOK TRUSTJOHN LAWSON LEGACY DAYS: $11,000 · OtherJOHN LAWSON LEGACY DAYSAYDEN-GRIFTON HIGH SCHOOL: $11,000 · OtherAYDEN-GRIFTON HIGH SCHOOLRHEMS FIRE AND RESCUE INC: $10,200 · OtherRHEMS FIRE AND RESCUE INCCENTER FOR FAMILY VIOLENCE PREV: $5,500 · OtherPITT COUNTY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $5,500 · OtherST MARYS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $5,300 · Other+4 more: $9,850 · Other+4 moreGRIFTON RESCUE SQUAD INC: $56,650 · HealthGRIFTON RESCUE SQUAD INCGRIFTON MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterGRIFTON SHAD FESTIVAL INC: $13,500 · Recreation & SportsHISTORICAL MUSEUM AND INDIAN VILLAG: $13,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$157,750Health$56,650Housing & Shelter$20,000Recreation & Sports$13,500Arts & Culture$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRIFTON RESCUE SQUAD INC: $56,650 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetGRIFTON MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $20,000 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetGRIFTON SHAD FESTIVAL INC: $13,500 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetHISTORICAL MUSEUM AND INDIAN VILLAG: $13,000 over 9y, 63% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GRIFTON RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds GRIFTON MISSION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GRIFTON SHAD FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HISTORICAL MUSEUM AND INDIAN VILLAG ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jean Harvey Williams Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jean Harvey Williams Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jean Harvey Williams’ filings →

    More from the funding graph