Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jane and Richard Eskind and Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$50k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

50% of The Jane and Richard Eskind and Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to President And Fellows Of Harvard College, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 7 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The Jane and Richard Eskind and Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $70k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

28
’19
18
’20
23
’21
1
’22
5
’23
7
’24
7
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$1.0MScience & Tech$500kHuman Services$214kHealth$210kReligion$176kRecreation & Sports$102kPhilanthropy$90kCivil Rights$88kOther$0
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k7 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FISK UNIVERSITY$50,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
THE TEMPLE - CONGREGATION OHABAI SHOLOM$2,850
MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE$2,500
CUMBERLAND HEIGHTS$1,000
LAND TRUST FOR TN$1,000
NANTUCKET BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$1,000
ALIVE HOSPICE$1,000
NANTUCKET HISTORY ASSOCIATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS TOWN: $350 → 12%HOPE STATION: $3k → 9%GORDON JEWISH COMMUNTIY CENTER: $19k → 14%ALIVE HOSPICE: $3k → 14%FIFTY FORWARD: $1k → 14%FIFTY FORWARD: $1k → 14%ALIVE HOSPICE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
NE
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$599k · 36 repeat orgs$936k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2023, 29 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
69

Total granted

$599k
$273k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+21%

Still filing today

58%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $491k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    FISK UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2019–2024 · $262k · revenue +40%
  • MM
    MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE
    3× · 2019–2024 · $112k · revenue +67%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    2× · 2019–2020 · $20k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • A
    ACLU
    one grant, 2019 · $65k
  • JF
    JEWISH FOUNDATION OF NASHVILLE
    one grant, 2019 · $55k
  • SC
    SOCIETY CLASICLA REFORM JUDAIS
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
6
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
11
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
12
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nashville Cares; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 123 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/57
Grantees still filing
42/57
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

President and Fellows of Harvard College: $500,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard CollegeBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $480,000 · EducationBRANDEIS UNIVERSITYFISK UNIVERSITY: $261,500 · EducationFISK UNIVERSITYMEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE: $111,500 · EducationMEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGENASHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationNASHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION+9 more: $86,850 · Education+9 moreABES GARDEN COMMUNITY: $150,000 · OtherABES GARDEN COMMUNITYHARVARD COLLEGE: $113,000 · OtherHARVARD COLLEGEVANDERBILT HILLEL: $110,000 · OtherVANDERBILT HILLELUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLEACLU: $65,000 · OtherACLUJEWISH FOUNDATION OF NASHVILLE: $55,000 · OtherJEWISH FOUNDATION OF NASHVILLE+82 more: $242,980 · Other+82 moreGILDA'S CLUB MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $75,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $3,000 · Health+2 more: $1,150 · HealthJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NASHVILLE: $18,500 · Human ServicesALIVE HOSPICE INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOPE STATION: $2,500 · Human ServicesSENIOR CITIZENS INC: $2,000 · Human Services+1 more: $350 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $20,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,000 · Civil RightsCASA INC: $1,000 · Civil Rights+1 more: $250 · Civil RightsNASHVILLE PUBLIC RADIO: $3,000 · Arts & CultureNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $2,500 · Arts & CultureCHEEKWOOD BOTANICAL GARDEN AND MUSEUM OF ART: $1,000 · Arts & CultureHUMANITIES TENNESSEE: $500 · Arts & CultureANDREW JACKSON FOUNDATION FKA LADIES' HERMITAGE ASSOCIATION: $250 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $100 · Arts & Culture
Education$1,539,850Other$835,980Health$82,150Human Services$27,350Philanthropy$25,000Civil Rights$22,250Arts & Culture$7,350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $500,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $480,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFISK UNIVERSITY: $261,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE: $111,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $75,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBelmont University: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALIVE HOSPICE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTENNESSEE JUSTICE CENTER INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE PUBLIC RADIO: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOPE STATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC: $2,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE TREE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY dba AMERICAN BAPTIST COLLEGE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNASHVILLE CARES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHEEKWOOD BOTANICAL GARDEN AND MUSEUM OF ART: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUR KIDS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANITIES TENNESSEE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WARNER PARKS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET ATHENEUM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE AND THE CUMBERLANDS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NASHVILLE: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANDREW JACKSON FOUNDATION FKA LADIES' HERMITAGE ASSOCIATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRICHLAND CREEK WATERSHED ALLIANCE: $250 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBook Em: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds FISK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NASHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB MIDDLE TENNESSEE ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Belmont University ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NASHVILLE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH ↗
  • Who funds ALIVE HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds TENNESSEE JUSTICE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Memorial Foundation IncTN42.6× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Memorial Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · The Frist Foundation · The Steven & Laurie Eskind Family Foundation · Hca Healthcare Foundation · Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist Foundation · United Way of Middle Tennessee Inc · The Blum Family Foundation · The Wade-Buntin Family Foundation · The Healing Trust Formerly Baptist Healing Hospital Trust · The Annette & Irwin Eskind Family Foundation · The Joel C & Bernice W Gordon Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jane and Richard Eskind and Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jane and Richard Eskind and Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Nantucket Historical Association: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Jane and Richard Eskind and Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Jane and Richard Eskind and Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 123 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jane and Richard Eskind and Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph