Skip to content

· Private foundation

The James and Kathleen Leber Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Education$151kRecreation & Sports$16kHousing & Shelter$10kPhilanthropy$7kEnvironment$6kHuman Services$3kFood & Nutrition$2kAnimals$500Other$0
02FY2022 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k5 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY$12,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$7,527
HOLIDAYS FOR THE HOMELESS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,500
THE FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES$2,300
GOLF FORE AFRICA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES: $2k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$181k · 9 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$181k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-25%
+86%

Still filing today

56%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EducationPhilanthropyAnimalsPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SETON HALL UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $73k · revenue +58%
  • MU
    MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $42k · revenue +5%
  • SB
    ST BENEDICT'S PREP
    3× · 2017–2020 · $18k

Funded once

  • SB
    ST BENEDICTS PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • HF
    HOLIDAY FOR THE HOMEWELL
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • VC
    VVA CHAPTER 12
    one grant, 2021 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
2
Montefiore New Rochelle Hospital

Mission: to heal, to teach, to discover and to advance the health of the communities we serve. values: humanity, innovation, teamwork, diversity and equity - our values define our philosophy of care. they shape our actions and motivate and…

Health
3
Monmouth Medical Center

To meet the healthcare needs of our community by providing cost-effective quality care. to educate present and future generations of healthcare providers. to provide a continuum of regional tertiary care. please refer to the organization's…

Health
4
Seton Hill University

Comprehensive institution of higher learning providing undergraduate and graduate student education.

Education
5
Ttee Monmouth Medical Center Fdn Uw
—
6
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education
7
St John's University New York

St. john's university is a catholic, vincentian, metropolitan, and global institution of higher education (continued on schedule o).

Education
8
Virtua Medical Group Pa

The physicians of virtua medical group (vmg) share a common philosophy in all they do: to create an outstanding experience for patients. in a broad range of specialties, from family medicine to surgery to oncology, vmg's highly-trained…

Health
9
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
10
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
11
The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide educational services, see schedule o.

Education
12
Molloy University

Molloy university, an independent catholic university, rooted in the dominican tradition of study, spirituality, service, and community, is committed to academic excellence with respect for each person. through transformative education,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Foodbank of Monmouth and Ocean Counties Inc D/B/a Fulfill; the most unlike its peers is Golf Fore Africa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SETON HALL UNIVERSITY: $72,750 · OtherSETON HALL UNIVERSITYST BENEDICT'S PREP: $18,250 · OtherST BENEDICT'S PREPGOLF FORE AFRICA INC: $16,000 · OtherGOLF FORE AFRICA INCHOLIDAYS FOR THE HOMELESS AND UNDER PRIVILEGED INC: $10,000 · OtherHOLIDAYS FOR THE HOMELESS AND UNDER PRIVILEGED INCST BENEDICTS PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $10,000 · OtherST BENEDICTS PREPARATORY SCHOOL INCIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFULFILL MONMOUTH & OCEAN: $5,500 · Other+3 more: $3,000 · OtherMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC: $42,000 · EducationMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INCSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $7,527 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TO…+1 more: $300 · EducationHope For The Warriors: $6,500 · PhilanthropyTHE FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES INC D/B/A FULFILL: $2,300 · Human ServicesMONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $500 · AnimalsCOLTS NECK FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $250 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$144,500Education$49,827Philanthropy$6,500Human Services$2,300Animals$500Public Safety & Disaster$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSETON HALL UNIVERSITY: $72,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC: $42,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGOLF FORE AFRICA INC: $16,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHOLIDAYS FOR THE HOMELESS AND UNDER PRIVILEGED INC: $10,000 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $7,527 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHope For The Warriors: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES INC D/B/A FULFILL: $2,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLTS NECK FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The James and Kathleen Leber Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The James and Kathleen Leber Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Seton Hall University: 1% of income from government
  • Monmouth University Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The James and Kathleen Leber Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The James and Kathleen Leber Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James and Kathleen Leber’s filings →

More from the funding graph