Skip to content

· Private foundation

The James a and Gwendolyn L Pell Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$174k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$201kHealth$153kHuman Services$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kReligion$16kAnimals$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$60,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC$30,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$20,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF THE KINGS DAU$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$20,000
FROG DOG K9 INC$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $60k → 11%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $30k → 14%SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 13%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $30k → 17%THE INDEPENDENCE FUND INC: $20k → 10%FROG DOG K9 INC: $4k → 9%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF THE KINGS DAU: $30k → 19%TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $20k → 17%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF THE KINGS DAU: $20k → 19%TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $20k → 17%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF THE KING'S: $10k → 19%TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $41k → 11%NORFOLK SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION: $2k → 19%NORFOLK SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION: $1k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
VA
KS
TN
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$350k · 5 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$350k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+67%

Still filing today

60%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationInternationalHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $201k · revenue +83%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $70k · revenue +29%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters
    3× · 2021–2025 · $60k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • TI
    The Independence Fund Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +67%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Shriners' Hospital for Children

Shriners children's is committed to compassionate, high-quality care that improves children's lives, in a family-centered and collaborative environment. (continued on schedule o)

Health
2
Stc Healthcare Partners Llc

Website: https://towerhealth.org/locations/st-christophers-hospital- children stc opco, llc (st. christopher's hospital for children) provides a full range of high-quality healthcare services to all children and youth up to age 21 who seek…

Health
3
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
4
Head Strong Project Inc

The head strong project (headstrong) is a non-profit organization founded in 2012 that provides barrier-free, stigma-free ptsd treatment to veterans, transitioning service members, and family members connected to their care.

Health
5
The Veterans and First Responders
Human Services
6
Warrior Kids Foundation
Health
7
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
8
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
9
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
10
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
11
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
12
Shriners Hospital for Children
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $201,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIONST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $70,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL…Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters: $60,021 · HealthChildren's Hospital of the King's Da…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $20,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual…INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTI: $16,000 · OtherINTERNATIO…FROG DOG K9 INC: $4,000 · OtherFROG DOG K…NORFOLK SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION: $3,000 · OtherNORFOLK SO…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $30,000 · InternationalThe Independence Fund Inc: $20,000 · Public BenefitWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $20,000 · Human Services
Education$201,000Health$150,021Other$43,000International$30,000Public Benefit$20,000Human Services$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $201,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital of the King's Daughters: $60,021 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Independence Fund Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFROG DOG K9 INC: $4,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The James a and Gwendolyn L Pell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The James a and Gwendolyn L Pell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The James a and Gwendolyn L Pell Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The James a and Gwendolyn L Pell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James a and Gwendolyn L Pell’s filings →

More from the funding graph