Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Private foundation

The Jake Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$57k
Granted FY2021
6
Grants FY2021
6
Organizations funded FY2021
0%
First-time grantees FY2021
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

54% of The Jake Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Philadelphia Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year The Jake Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $57k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
4
’18
6
’19
5
’20
5
’21
3
’22
3
’23
4
’24
4
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2021
$7,500
Largest grant, FY2021
$25,000
Organizations funded a year
5 to 7
FY2017 to FY2021
States reached, FY2021
2
Total assets, FY2021
$148k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2021, 0% of the organizations The Jake Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21
Recreation & SportsArts & Culture
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20216$57k0%
FY20206$54k0%
FY20197$248k29%
FY20185$20k0%
FY20175$24kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$200kArts & Culture$90kEducation$61kHuman Services$57kHousing & Shelter$51kPhilanthropy$50kEmployment$46kAnimals$22kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
United States Squash Racquets Assoc Inc$200,00011%
Philadelphia Museum of Art$90,00050%
Squashsmarts Inc$61,00090%
Project Home$51,00090%
Baker Industries Inc$46,00090%
Zoological Society of Philadelphia$22,00050%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($72k), not named here.

Compare The Jake Foundation with peer funders

About The Jake Foundation

How much does The Jake Foundation give?
The Jake Foundation reported 6 grants totaling $57,000 in its FY2021 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 7 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2021.
What does The Jake Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Recreation & Sports (34%), Arts & Culture (15%), Education (10%).
Who are The Jake Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: United States Squash Racquets Assoc Inc ($200k), Philadelphia Museum of Art ($90k), Squashsmarts Inc ($61k).
Does The Jake Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2021, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Jake Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where is The Jake Foundation based?
The Jake Foundation is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jake’s filings →

More from the funding graph