Skip to content
The Jack D Mosseri Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Jack D Mosseri Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$332k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$83k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0168% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$318kHuman Services$186kHealth$66kYouth Development$45kEducation$30kPhilanthropy$24kFood & Nutrition$19kInternational$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $193k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $83k
$5,200
Median grant
2
States reached
$36k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$83,441
RENEWAL$42,101
YESHIVA OF FLATBUSH$37,167
Individual grant recipient$25,008
NEW YORK UNIVERITY$20,000
SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER$18,000
Individual grant recipient$16,500
Individual grant recipient$12,100
DARCHEI DAVID FOUNDATION$12,000
MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,800
SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY CENTER$5,200
NEW YORK CANCER CENTER$5,200
Individual grant recipient$5,200
BONEI OLAM INC$5,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $170k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $26k → 11%SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $18k → 11%SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $10k → 11%SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $4k → 11%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $32k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $30k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $21k → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $5k → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $5k → 20%A TORAH INFERTILITY MEDIUM OF EXCHANGE: $501 → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $5k → 20%A TORAH INFERTILITY MEDIUM OF EXCHANGE: $501 → 20%BONEI OLAM INC: $3k → 20%AHAVA BABY: $9k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 28 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
28

Total granted

$1.2M
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+75%

Still filing today

46%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationReligionHealthYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $83k · revenue +0%
  • TS
    THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER
    4× · 2021–2024 · $58k · revenue +88%
  • C
    CHAZAK
    2× · 2022–2023 · $45k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • AB
    AHAVA BABY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $9k · revenue +156%
  • TS
    THE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +37%
  • LS
    LARCHWOOD SYNAGOGUE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
3
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
4
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
5
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
6
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
7
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
8
Sephardic Institute Sephardic Institute for Advanced Learning

Our mission is to provide religious services, instruction and understanding of Judaism within the Orthodox Jewish religion and rational thought to the Jewish community with a stress on the Sephardic Jewish tradition.

Religion
9
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
10
Bnei Moshe
Philanthropy
11
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
12
Chasudim Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shaare Mordechai Inc; the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
16/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $234,262 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH: $200,617 · OtherYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSHIndividual grant recipient: $113,356 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $78,067 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRENEWAL: $45,701 · OtherDARCHEI DAVID FOUNDATION: $44,000 · Other+39 more: $203,660 · Other+39 moreSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $83,268 · Human ServicesSBH COMMUNITY S…THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $57,600 · Human ServicesTHE SPECIAL CHI…Bonei Olam Inc: $18,800 · Human ServicesBonei Olam IncAHAVA BABY INC: $9,167 · Human ServicesAHAVA BABY INC+1 more: $1,002 · Human ServicesCHAZAK: $45,200 · Youth DevelopmentSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $35,200 · Youth DevelopmentMONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER: $24,370 · HealthNew York Cancer Center Inc: $21,167 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthNew York University: $20,000 · EducationILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $6,300 · EducationSEPHARDIC ACADEMY OF MANHATTAN INC: $4,167 · EducationBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 · EducationTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $18,652 · Food & NutritionBNEI MELACHIM INC: $8,800 · ReligionSHAARE MORDECHAI INC: $3,600 · ReligionYeshivat Lev Torah: $2,600 · Religion+1 more: $450 · Religion
Other$919,663Human Services$169,837Youth Development$80,400Health$46,537Education$32,267Food & Nutrition$18,652Religion$15,450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $83,268 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $57,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHAZAK: $45,200 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetDARCHEI DAVID FOUNDATION: $44,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $35,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNew York Cancer Center Inc: $21,167 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNew York University: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $18,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $18,652 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $9,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAHAVA BABY INC: $9,167 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetBNEI MELACHIM INC: $8,800 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $7,901 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $6,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEPHARDIC ACADEMY OF MANHATTAN INC: $4,167 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHAARE MORDECHAI INC: $3,600 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $2,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYeshivat Lev Torah: $2,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR SEPHARDIC STUDIES: $2,002 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $1,002 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARMEI HA'IR INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHALSHELET SEMINARY INC: $450 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHAZAK ↗
  • Who funds DARCHEI DAVID FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds New York Cancer Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds AHAVA BABY INC ↗
  • Who funds BNEI MELACHIM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds ILAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC ACADEMY OF MANHATTAN INC ↗
  • Who funds SHAARE MORDECHAI INC ↗
  • Who funds PEYLIM LEV LACHIM ↗
  • Who funds Yeshivat Lev Torah ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Fou…The Howard Hoffman & …Ralph J Harary Founda…Chehebar Family Found…Jewish Communal FundThe Ralph S Gindi Fam…The Amin and Lillian …Ic Hessed FoundationE R G FoundationComp Foundation IncAltoon Sutton Memoria…Samuel & Mollie Jemal…
Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY48.6× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · Chehebar Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Ic Hessed Foundation · E R G Foundation · Comp Foundation Inc · Altoon Sutton Memorial Fund · Samuel & Mollie Jemal Foundation Co Jem Realty

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jack D Mosseri Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jack D Mosseri Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • The Special Children Center: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jack D Mosseri Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home