Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Iwan Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$177k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Education$297kInternational$9kHuman Services$5kFood & Nutrition$5kAnimals$4kCommunity Improvement$2kReligion$2kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$109,801
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of Illinois Foundation$109,801
University of Illinois Foundation$67,301
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Safe Children Coalition: $1k → 9%Safe Children Coalition: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$323k · 13 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
11

Total granted

$323k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+318%

Still filing today

62%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
InternationalFood & NutritionAnimalsEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Illinois Foundation
    7× · 2017–2023 · $258k · revenue +127%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +98%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +140%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • KC
    KIPP Chicago
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • TREVOR PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +318%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
2
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
3
Unicef Usa Impact Fund for Children Inc

The unicef usa impact fund for children exists to develop and implement financial solutions to ensure every child is healthy, educated, protected, and respected. we believe truly scalable, long-term impact will only be accomplished when we…

Philanthropy
4
Childfund Alliance

Childfund alliance is a global network of 11 child-focused development and humanitarian organizations working in more than 70 countries. we help nearly 30 million children and their families to overcome poverty and the underlying…

International
5
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
6
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
7
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
8
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

9
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
10
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
11
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
12
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Children's Advocacy Center and the most unlike its peers is Underdog Rescue of Florida Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
12/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University of Illinois Foundation — $258,099 · EducationUniversity of Illinois FoundationUniversity of Illinois — $38,821 · OtherUniversity of Illino…Unicef United States Fund — $4,038 · OtherUnicef United States…Individual grant recipient — $3,000 · OtherKIPP Chicago — $2,000 · OtherSeashore Community Church — $2,000 · OtherWounded Warriors — $2,000 · Other+9 more — $8,054 · Other+9 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $3,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $2,092 · InternationalGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $3,000 · Food & NutritionALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC — $2,000 · Food & NutritionPAWS CHICAGO — $3,000 · AnimalsUNDERDOG RESCUE OF FLORIDA INC — $1,000 · AnimalsSAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesTREVOR PROJECT INC — $1,000 · Civil Rights
Education$258,099Other$59,913International$5,092Food & Nutrition$5,000Animals$4,000Human Services$2,000Civil Rights$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $258,099 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $2,092 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNDERDOG RESCUE OF FLORIDA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $796 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
  • Who funds PAWS CHICAGO
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
  • Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds SAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds CHICAGO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER
  • Who funds UNDERDOG RESCUE OF FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Iwan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc1% of income from government
  • Safe Children Coalition Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph