Skip to content
The House Next Door Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

The House Next Door Inc

Our mission is to empower and nurture families to build stronger communities.

$157k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Education$430kYouth Development$311kHuman Services$247kPhilanthropy$47kCommunity Improvement$30kReligion$11k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $125,252, the rows itemized in this filing. The $156,810 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $31,558 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $85k
$10,443
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TLC KIDS LLC$19,637
NANA'S INFANTS AND CHILDREN LEARNING CENTER CORP$16,873
THE FUTURE LITTLE LEARNERS CENTER LLC$15,321
FUTURE LITTLE LEARNERS II$11,386
TWINKLE TOES EARLY LEARNING CENTER INC$11,070
KINGDOM BUILDERS CHILD CARE CENTER$10,443
CREATIVE CHRISTIAN PRESCHOOL$9,388
KIDS JUST WANT TO BE KIDS LLC$9,007
LOVING ARMS LEARNING CENTER LLC$8,671
BEAUTIFUL BEGINNINGS CHILDCARE CENTER INC$8,413
A SURE FOUNDATION$5,043
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FORD'S ALL-STAR ACADEMY: $9k → 10%A SURE FOUNDATION: $42k → 12%NANA'S INFANTS AND CHILDREN LEARNING CENTER CORP: $82k → 16%FUTURE LITTLE LEARNERS II: $71k → 23%KINGDOM BUILDERS CHILD CARE CENTER: $47k → 10%KID CITY USA: $16k → 12%CREATIVE CHRISTIAN PRESCHOOL: $66k → 16%THE FUTURE LITTLE LEARNERS CENTER LLC: $68k → 23%KINGDOM BUILDERS CHILD CARE CENTER: $10k → 10%A SURE FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%NANA'S INFANTS AND CHILDREN LEARNING CENTER CORP: $17k → 16%THE FUTURE LITTLE LEARNERS CENTER LLC: $15k → 23%TLC KIDS: $116k → 12%CREATIVE CHRISTIAN PRESCHOOL: $9k → 16%FUTURE LITTLE LEARNERS II: $11k → 23%TLC KIDS: $114k → 12%HEAVENLY SENT KIDS & CO: $5k → 16%TLC KIDS LLC: $20k → 12%SANTUARIO LAS ESCRITURAS: $11k → 12%LOVING ARMS LEARNING CENTER LLC: $57k → 12%LOVING ARMS LEARNING CENTER LLC: $9k → 12%THE CHILES ACADEMY INC: $46k → 12%BEAUTIFUL BEGINNINGS CHILDCARE CENTER INC: $41k → 12%BEAUTIFUL BEGINNINGS CHILDCARE CENTER INC: $8k → 12%KIDS JUST WANT TO BE KIDS LLC: $63k → 12%TRINITY HILL ENTERPRISES INC: $30k → 12%KIDS JUST WANT TO BE KIDS LLC: $9k → 12%TWINKLE TOES EARLY LEARNING CENTER INC: $66k → 12%TWINKLE TOES EARLY LEARNING CENTER INC: $11k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$957k · 11 repeat orgs$117k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$957k
$117k

Still filing today

0%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TK
    TLC KIDS
    3× · 2023–2025 · $249k
  • NI
    NANA'S INFANTS AND CHILDREN LEARNING CENTER CORP
    2× · 2024–2025 · $99k
  • TF
    THE FUTURE LITTLE LEARNERS CENTER INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $83k

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CHILES ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $46k · revenue -3%
  • TH
    TRINITY HILL ENTERPRISES INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • RW
    RONALD WHEAT
    one grant, 2024 · $16k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2018 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
1/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TLC KIDS: $249,068 · OtherTLC KIDSNANA'S INFANTS AND CHILDREN LEARNING CENTER CORP: $98,767 · OtherNANA'S INFANTS AND CHILDREN LEARNING CENTER CORPTHE FUTURE LITTLE LEARNERS CENTER INC: $82,933 · OtherTHE FUTURE LITTLE LEARNERS CENTER INCFUTURE LITTLE LEARNERS II: $82,420 · OtherFUTURE LITTLE LEARNERS IITWINKLE TOES ELC INC: $76,762 · OtherTWINKLE TOES ELC INCCREATIVE CHRISTIAN PRESCHOOL & LEAR: $75,069 · OtherCREATIVE CHRISTIAN PRESCHOOL & LEARKIDS JUST WANT TO BE KIDS LLC: $72,165 · OtherKIDS JUST WANT TO BE KIDS LLCLOVING ARMS LEARNING CENTER LLC: $66,051 · OtherLOVING ARMS LEARNING CENTER LLCKINGDOM BUILDERS CHILD CARE CENTER: $57,644 · OtherKINGDOM BUILDERS CHILD CARE CENTERBEAUTIFUL BEGINNINGS CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $49,805 · OtherA SURE FOUNDATION LLC: $46,654 · Other+4 more: $65,288 · Other+4 moreTHE CHILES ACADEMY INC: $46,463 · EducationSISTER 2 SISTER INC: $5,185 · Philanthropy
Other$1,022,626Education$46,463Philanthropy$5,185

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHILES ACADEMY INC: $46,463 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetSISTER 2 SISTER INC: $5,185 over 1y, 6.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHILES ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds SISTER 2 SISTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

The Early Learning Co…
The Early Learning Coalition of Flagler and Volusia Counties IncFL24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Early Learning Coalition of Flagler and Volusia Counties Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The House Next Door Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The House Next Door Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on House Next Door’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home