Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Tennessee · Public charity

The Hope Promise the Charlie Glass Sarcoma Research Foundation

To raise funds for finding a cure for sarcoma cancer.

$125k
Granted FY2018
1
Grants FY2018
1
Organizations funded FY2018
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2018
$125,000
Largest grant, FY2018
$125,000
States reached, FY2018
1
Total assets, FY2018
$2k

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2018.

MD ANDERSON CENTER$125,000

Compare The Hope Promise the Charlie Glass Sarcoma Research Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hope Promise the Charlie Glass Sarcoma Research Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Hope Promise the Charlie Glass Sarcoma Research Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Hope Promise the Charlie Glass Sarcoma Research Foundation

How much does The Hope Promise the Charlie Glass Sarcoma Research Foundation give?
The Hope Promise the Charlie Glass Sarcoma Research Foundation reported 1 grants totaling $125,000 in its FY2018 IRS filing.
What does The Hope Promise the Charlie Glass Sarcoma Research Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2018, its largest causes are Health (100%).
Where is The Hope Promise the Charlie Glass Sarcoma Research Foundation based?
The Hope Promise the Charlie Glass Sarcoma Research Foundation is based in TN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2020) is on record but names no grant recipient (grants abroad are filed by region only, and grants under $5,000 are not itemized), so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hope Promise the Charlie Glass Sarcoma Research’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home