Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Arizona · Public charity

The Hope Effect

THE HOPE EFFECT is a nonprofit organization changing how the world cares for orphans by implementing innovative family-based solutions. We facilitate family-style care that provides opportunity for each child to flourish and thrive in a family environment.

$231k
Granted FY2022
1
Itemized grants FY2022
1
Organizations funded FY2022
0%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2022
$15k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2022
$15,000
Largest grant, FY2022
$15,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 2
FY2019 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
1
Total assets, FY2022
$315k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 0% of the organizations The Hope Effect funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20221$15k0%
FY20212$66k0%
FY20201$68k0%
FY20192$80kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

International$228k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Lightshine A Living Hope Inc$167,744416%
Legado de Esperanza Foundation$60,600210%

Compare The Hope Effect with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hope Effect?

Find your warmest path to The Hope Effect through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Hope Effect

How much does The Hope Effect give?
The Hope Effect reported 1 itemized grants totaling $15,000, out of $231,206 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 2 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2022.
What does The Hope Effect fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2022, its largest causes are International (100%).
Who are The Hope Effect's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2022: Lightshine A Living Hope Inc ($168k), Legado de Esperanza Foundation ($61k).
Does The Hope Effect fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is The Hope Effect based?
The Hope Effect is based in AZ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $379k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hope Effect’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home