Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Honorable Jeffrey a Abber Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$17kEducation$3kHousing & Shelter$262Religion$258Human Services$250International$206Other$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$21k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,000
PAN MASS CHALLENGE$1,663
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$1,031
Individual grant recipient$1,000
LEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$750
BREAD OF LIFE MALDEN$258
LT SCOTT F MILLEY RANGER FOUNDATION$257
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $512) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PINE STREET INN: $262 → 16%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15k · 3 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +97% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
13

Total granted

$15k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+24%

Still filing today

67%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    3× · 2019–2021 · $6k · revenue +97%
  • PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $5k · revenue +6%
  • MG
    MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL
    3× · 2019–2024 · $4k

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERISTY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
2
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
3
The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc

The mission of the breast cancer research foundation, inc. is to prevent and cure breast cancer by advancing the world's most promising research.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Diabetes Research Institute Foundation Inc

To provide the diabetes research institute with the funding to cure diabetes now.

Health
5
Cancer Research Institute Inc

See schedule ocri is a nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing cancer immunotherapy through scientific discovery and global collaboration. since 1953, cri has funded research that deepens understanding of the immune system and its…

Health
6
Scleroderma Research Foundation

The mission of the Scleroderma Research Foundation is to fund and facilitate the most promising, highest quality research aimed at new treatments and, ultimately, a cure for scleroderma.

Health
7
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
8
Addario Lung Cancer Medical Institute

The Addario Lung Cancer Medical Institute ALCMI is dedicated to catalyzing and accelerating the discovery, development and delivery of new and more effective treatment options for lung cancer patients.

Health
9
Arthritis National Research Foundation

To provide initial research funding to brilliant, investigative scientists with new ideas to cure arthritis and related autoimmune diseases.

Health
10
Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy

The parker institute for cancer immunotherapy's (pici) mission is to accelerate the development of breakthrough immune therapies to turn all cancers into curable diseases.

Health
11
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
12
Lymphoma Research Foundation

To eradicate lymphoma and serve those touched by this disease.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lt Scott F Milley Ranger Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $4,999 · OtherPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INCMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $3,741 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERISTY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $1,000 · OtherUNIVERISTY OF NEW HAMPSHIREIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST: $1,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERSTIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMALDEN HIGH SCHOOL: $1,000 · OtherMALDEN HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $855 · Other+4 more: $906 · OtherDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $6,084 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute …LEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $750 · HealthLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION+1 more: $100 · HealthPINE STREET INN INC: $262 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 · Human ServicesLT SCOTT F MILLEY RANGER FOUNDATION: $257 · EducationBest Buddies International Inc: $206 · International
Other$18,501Health$6,934Human Services$512Education$257International$206

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $6,084 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $4,999 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $262 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLT SCOTT F MILLEY RANGER FOUNDATION: $257 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $206 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds LEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
  • Who funds LT SCOTT F MILLEY RANGER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Honorable Jeffrey a Abber Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Honorable Jeffrey a Abber Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Honorable Jeffrey a Abber’s filings →

More from the funding graph