Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

New York · Public charity

The Historical Society of the New York Courts

The mission of the society is as follows: - to preserve the legal history of the state of new york; - to foster scholarly understanding and public appreciation of the history of the new york courts and the contribution of the judicial branch of government to new york state and the nation; - to encourage research into the history and…

$43k
Granted FY2023
2
Itemized grants FY2023
2
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2023
$41k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2023
$34,125
Largest grant, FY2023
$34,125
Organizations funded a year
1 to 2
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
2
Total assets, FY2023
$781k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations The Historical Society of the New York Courts funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20232$41k0%
FY20222$17k0%
FY20212$28k0%
FY20201$30k0%
FY20192$49k50%
FY20182$30k0%
FY20172$25kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$133kSocial Science$86k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Bard College$113,35070%
The Aspen Institute Inc$85,53040%
George Jackson Academy$20,00020%

Compare The Historical Society of the New York Courts with peer funders

About The Historical Society of the New York Courts

How much does The Historical Society of the New York Courts give?
The Historical Society of the New York Courts reported 2 itemized grants totaling $40,625, out of $42,625 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 2 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does The Historical Society of the New York Courts fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2023, its largest causes are Education (61%), Social Science (39%).
Who are The Historical Society of the New York Courts's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2023: Bard College ($113k), The Aspen Institute Inc ($86k), George Jackson Academy ($20k).
Does The Historical Society of the New York Courts fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is The Historical Society of the New York Courts based?
The Historical Society of the New York Courts is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $26k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Historical Society of the New York Courts’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home