· Private foundation
The Herschlag Family Fund
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $7,200 |
| CONG TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF | $4,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,321 |
| CONG TZIDKAS RUCHEL INC | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $680 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| KOLLEL CHOSHEN MISHPAT | $500 |
| KOLLEL CHOSHEN MISHPAT | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $360 |
| CONG VAYKOM PINCHAS | $360 |
| Individual grant recipient | $360 |
| FRIENDS OF MOSDOT GOOR | $360 |
| YESHIVA MEOR ANAYIM | $180 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
28 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- IGIndividual grant recipient7× · 2019–2025 · $220k
- IGIndividual grant recipient7× · 2019–2025 · $62k
- CVChinu V Chisdu Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $55k · revenue -83%
Funded once
- YEYESHIVAH EISEK HATORAH INCone grant, 2023 · $22k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Religious Teaching
encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.
Provide financial assistance to torah and talmudic scholars, as well as to other needy individuals and other organizations that work to promote these purposes.
To provide religious Jewish education.
Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide funds to needy individuals in the state of israel.
To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Joseph Chehebar Family Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Zecher Avrohom Inc · Bais Ephraim Charitable Foundation Trust · The Ohr Yitzchok Family Foundation · Birchas Mordechai Charitable Foundation · Keren Yud Mem Inc · Kollel Zichron Avrohom Inc · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Herschlag Family Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Herschlag Family Fund. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Herschlag Family’s filings →