Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Herman and Louise Schmitt Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$101kHuman Services$98kPhilanthropy$80kFood & Nutrition$69kReligion$53kCrime & Legal$51kAnimals$36kArts & Culture$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,460
Median grant
1
States reached
$317k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY FOOD BANK$5,200
EMMAUS MISSION CENTER$5,200
CASS CO HUMANE SOCIETY$5,200
LOGANSPORT COMM SCHOOLS-FELIX'S PANTRY$5,190
TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH FOOD BANK$5,190
CALVARY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH LOAVES & FISHES$3,460
UNITED WAY OF CASS CO BEGINDERGARTEN PROGRAM$3,460
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF CASS CO$3,460
AREA FIVE AGENCY COMMUNITY SVCS HEALTHY FAMILIES$3,460
LOGANSPORT SCHOOL CORP-STEM PROGRAMS$3,460
LITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF CASS CO$3,460
VINEYARD COMMUNITY CHURCH OUTREACH PROGRAM$3,460
LOGANSPORT SCHOOL CORP-MUSIC INSTR FUND$3,460
AREA FIVE AGENCY COMMUNITY SVCS HEAD START$3,460
CIVIC PLAYERS OF LOGANSPORT$3,460
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%AREA FIVE AGENCY COMMUNITY SVCS: $7k → 13%AREA FIVE AGENCY COMMUNITY SVCS: $7k → 13%AREA FIVE AGENCY COMMUNITY SVCS: $7k → 13%AREA FIVE AGENCY COMMUNITY SVCS: $7k → 13%AREA FIVE AGENCY COMMUNITY SVCS: $7k → 13%AREA FIVE AGENCY COMMUNITY SVCS: $6k → 13%AREA FIVE AGENCY COMMUNITY SVCS: $6k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$571k · 27 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
2

Total granted

$571k
$7k

Still filing today

11%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING & COMMUNITY SERVICES
    7× · 2017–2023 · $46k · revenue +69%
  • EM
    EMMAUS MISSION CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +134%
  • CC
    CASS CO HUMANE SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $36k

Funded once

  • BP
    BACKPACK PROGRAM
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • LB
    LOGANSPORT BACKPACK PROGRAM UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CASS CO HUMANE SOCIETY: $36,470 · OtherCASS CO HUMANE SOCIETYTRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH FOOD BANK: $31,830 · OtherTRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH FOOD BANKSALVATION ARMY FOOD BANK: $30,445 · OtherSALVATION ARMY FOOD BANKCASS CO HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $30,086 · OtherCASS CO HISTORICAL SOCIETYDOMESTIC VIOLENCE TASK FORCE: $30,086 · OtherDOMESTIC VIOLENCE TASK FORCELITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF CASS CO: $30,086 · OtherLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF CASS COSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF CASS CO: $30,086 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF CASS COVINEYARD COMMUNITY CHURCH OUTREACH PROGRAM: $23,786 · OtherUNITED WAY OF CASS CO READING RAILROAD PROGRAM: $23,786 · OtherUNITED WAY OF CASS CO BEGINDERGARTEN PROGRAM: $23,786 · OtherCALVARY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $23,026 · OtherLOGANSPORT SCHOOL CORP-MUSIC INSTR FUND: $20,561 · OtherCASS PULASKI COMM CORRECTIONS LOGANS LANDING: $20,561 · Other+14 more: $116,721 · Other+14 moreAREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $46,052 · Human ServicesEMMAUS MISSION CENTER INC: $37,651 · ReligionMARY DYKEMAN GUILD OF MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $26,633 · Health
Other$471,316Human Services$46,052Religion$37,651Health$26,633

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $46,052 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEMMAUS MISSION CENTER INC: $37,651 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetMARY DYKEMAN GUILD OF MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $26,633 over 8y, 5.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING & COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds EMMAUS MISSION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MARY DYKEMAN GUILD OF MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Herman and Louise Schmitt Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Herman and Louise Schmitt Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Herman and Louise Schmitt’s filings →

    More from the funding graph