Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Herman and Hazel Owen Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$60k
Granted FY2026still arriving
13
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Human Services$287kHealth$64kHousing & Shelter$25kFood & Nutrition$25kArts & Culture$1kYouth Development$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$800Education$50Other$0
02FY2026 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k11 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$979k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HELPING HANDS INC$25,000
LAST HOUSE ON THE BLOCK$10,000
GOLDEN TRIANGLE HOMELESS COALITION$6,000
LOAVES AND FISHES SOUP KITCHEN OF LOWNDES COUNTY$5,000
GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CLINIC$5,000
CAMP RISING SUN$3,000
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
COLUMBUS LOWNDES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,000
BOYS AND GIRLS OF LOWNDES COUNTY$1,000
NATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
100 WOMEN WHO CARE$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $250) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%INSTITUTE OF COMMUNITY SERVICES: $250 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$387k · 14 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2026, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
27

Total granted

$387k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+38%

Still filing today

29%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HELPING HANDS INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $249k
  • TL
    THE LAST HOUSE ON THE BLOCK INC
    5× · 2022–2026 · $35k · revenue +66%
  • LA
    LOAVES AND FISHES SOUP KITCHEN OF LOWNDES COUNTY
    9× · 2018–2026 · $25k

Funded once

  • FI
    FATHERS IN THE FIELD
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • LC
    LIFE CHOICES CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2025 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ncscusa Housing Development Corp Three Inc

Operation of low income housing for the elderly and handicapped, regulated and assisted by the department of housing and urban development (hud).

Housing & Shelter
2
Transitional Housing Services

To provide decent affordable housing and transitional housing, emergency shelter, and support needs housing to lower income individuals and families.

Human Services
3
Ncscusa Housing Development Corp Two

Operation of low income housing for the elderly and handicapped, regulated and assisted by the department of housing and urban development (hud).

Housing & Shelter
4
Nantucket Community Service Inc

Provide low income elderly housing.

—
5
Nantucket Community Service Ii Inc

Provide low income elderly housing

Housing & Shelter
6
North Idaho Community Services Corp Dba Panhandle Affordable Housing Allianc

To develop and preserve housing in Kootenai County that our low-income neighbors and our local workers can afford. We want to provide not just a place to live, but a place to build a future, for all residents living in our county.

Unclassified
7
Louisiana Disabled Persons Housing Corp

Provide low cost housing to handicapped adults

—
8
Neighborhood Housing Services of Southern Nevada Inc

Neighborhood housing services of southern nevada, inc (nhssn) purpose is to provide affordable housing, homeownership, education and neighborhood revitalization in targeted areas throughout southern nevada to low and moderate-income…

Housing & Shelter
9
Community Housing Development Corp of North Richmond

To provide low-income housing.

Unclassified
10
Northside Community Housing Inc

To provide high quality housing that is affordable to low to moderate income area residents and to create opportunities for them to improve their lives and revitalize the community.

Housing & Shelter
11
Northeast Mississippi Habitat for Humanity Inc

To create decent, affordable housing for those in need and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience with people everywhere.

Housing & Shelter
12
Cooperative Housing Corporation

Cooperative Housings mission is to provide affordable, shared living residences and services for low to moderate income older adults and some special needs adults. The Corporation is dedicated to helping these individuals to enjoy adequate…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Mississippi Medical Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Last House On the Block Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HELPING HANDS INC: $248,880 · OtherHELPING HANDS INCLOAVES AND FISHES SOUP KITCHEN OF LOWNDES COUNTY: $24,500 · OtherLOAVES AND FISHES SOUP KITCHEN OF LOWNDES COUNTYSALVATION ARMY: $22,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYGOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CLINIC: $19,500 · OtherGOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CLINIC+34 more: $24,505 · Other+34 moreTHE LAST HOUSE ON THE BLOCK INC: $35,000 · HealthTHE LAST …+1 more: $162 · HealthGOLDEN TRIANGLE REGIONAL HOMELESS COALITION INC: $24,000 · Human Services+1 more: $250 · Human ServicesCAMP RISING SUN INC: $4,000 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC: $800 · Public Safety & DisasterCOLUMBUS ARTS COUNCIL: $700 · Arts & Culture
Other$339,385Health$35,162Human Services$24,250Recreation & Sports$4,000Public Safety & Disaster$800Arts & Culture$700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE LAST HOUSE ON THE BLOCK INC: $35,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetGOLDEN TRIANGLE REGIONAL HOMELESS COALITION INC: $24,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetCAMP RISING SUN INC: $4,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetCOLUMBUS ARTS COUNCIL: $700 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINSTITUTE OF COMMUNITY SERVICESINC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER INC: $162 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE LAST HOUSE ON THE BLOCK INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN TRIANGLE REGIONAL HOMELESS COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RISING SUN INC ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUSLOWNDES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF COMMUNITY SERVICESINC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Herman and Hazel Owen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Herman and Hazel Owen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Herman and Hazel Owen Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Herman and Hazel Owen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Herman and Hazel Owen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph