Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Helmar Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$20k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

50% of The Helmar Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The Helmar Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $45k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
17
10
18
7
19
8
20
6
21
4
22
5
23
1
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$516kPhilanthropy$361kAnimals$42kHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$24kInternational$4kReligion$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kOther$0
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k7 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$20,000
ASPCA$10,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FUND$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$3,000
THE 92ND STREET Y$2,500
THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER$2,000
TOMORROWS CHILDREN'S FUND$1,000
MAKE-A-WISH OF METRO NY & WESTERN NY$1,000
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 62% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE: $361k → 16%SCHWAB CHARITABLE: $361k → 10%THE NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE: $2k → 6%MAKE-A-WISH OF METRO NY & WESTERN NY: $1k → 17%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%WESLEYAN FUND: $1k → 7%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $20k → 17%KENYON COLLEGE: $1k → 12%OPERATION SMILE: $1k → 7%OPERATION SMILE: $2k → 19%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FUND: $5k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $20k → 17%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $20k → 17%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FUND: $3k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $15k → 17%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $2k → 17%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FUND: $2k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $15k → 17%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FUND: $2k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $15k → 17%CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY: $2k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $15k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $3k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $3k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $3k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $3k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $3k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $3k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $3k → 17%MCC THEATRE: $2k → 17%THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $3k → 17%THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $2k → 17%THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $2k → 17%THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $2k → 17%THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $2k → 17%THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $2k → 17%THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $2k → 17%ASPCA: $10k → 17%ASPCA: $6k → 17%THE 92ND STREET Y: $5k → 17%ASPCA: $5k → 17%THE 92ND STREET Y: $5k → 17%THE 92ND STREET Y: $4k → 17%THE 92ND STREET Y: $3k → 17%THE 92ND STREET Y: $3k → 17%THE 92ND STREET Y: $3k → 17%ASPCA: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
CA
VA
TN
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$251k · 17 repeat orgs$366k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +77% since the first grant, against -13% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
6

Total granted

$251k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
-13%

Still filing today

65%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $361k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthAnimalsInternationalReligionEducationPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $120k · revenue +145%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    6× · 2017–2023 · $25k · revenue +80%
  • TY
    THE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2017–2023 · $21k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -22%
  • OS
    OPERATION SMILE
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • MA
    MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
5
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
6
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
7
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
8
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
9
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
10
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
11
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $361,270 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $119,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC+3 more — $12,750 · HealthDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $361,272 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — $21,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FUND — $11,500 · OtherNATIONAL MS SOCIETY — $6,500 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH OF METRO NY & WESTERN NY — $3,000 · OtherMCC THEATRE — $2,500 · OtherWESLEYAN FUND — $2,000 · OtherKENYON COLLEGE — $1,750 · Other+5 more — $3,500 · OtherTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $25,000 · AnimalsTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER — $14,500 · AnimalsNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC — $2,500 · AnimalsTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION — $21,000 · ReligionMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $3,500 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INC — $3,500 · InternationalCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC — $2,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Health$493,520Philanthropy$361,272Other$51,750Animals$42,000Religion$21,000International$7,000Public Safety & Disaster$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $361,272 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $361,270 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $119,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $25,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION — $21,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER — $14,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOMORROWS CHILDREN'S FUND INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENYON COLLEGE — $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING WORKS INC — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF KAREN INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TOMORROWS CHILDREN'S FUND INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC
  • Who funds CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC
  • Who funds KENYON COLLEGE
  • Who funds HOUSING WORKS INC
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF KAREN INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Helmar Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph