Skip to content
The Heath Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Heath Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$249k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$559k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CYCLE CHALLENGE CANCER RESEARCH: $3k → 11%VEANA THERAPEUTICS: $30k → 8%PROVIDENCE CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $8k → 12%COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 11%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $10k → 9%NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $7k → 12%CSU FLINT ANIMAL CANCER CENTER: $5k → 11%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $10k → 9%NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION: $13k → 10%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $5k → 9%NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $5k → 9%NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER VIA US BANK VISA: $2k → 9%NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION: $6k → 10%NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION VIA US BANK VISA: $2k → 10%NEVADA CANCER COALITION: $25k → 10%NEVADA CANCER COALITION: $15k → 10%NEVADA CANCER COALITION: $10k → 10%NEVADA CANCER COALITION: $9k → 10%NEVADA CANCER COALITION: $6k → 10%NEVADA CANCER COALITION: $4k → 10%NEVADA CANCER COALITION: $3k → 10%NEVADA CANCER COALITION VIA US BANK VISA: $2k → 10%NEVADA CANCER COALITION: $100 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$168k · 3 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +197% since the first grant, against +62% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
9

Total granted

$168k
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+197%
+62%

Still filing today

67%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NEVADA CANCER COALITION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $73k · revenue +290%
  • NN
    NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +197%
  • FH
    FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
    4× · 2019–2025 · $30k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • CS
    COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • PC
    PROVIDENCE CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue -90%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $30,000 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTERCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITYPROVIDENCE CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $7,500 · OtherPROVIDENCE CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATIONROTARY CLUB OF RENO: $5,750 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF RENOCSU FLINT ANIMAL CANCER CENTER: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $6,199 · Other+3 moreNEVADA CANCER COALITION: $72,524 · HealthNEVADA CANCER COALITIONPROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $7,000 · HealthPROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL FOUNDATI…NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION: $65,225 · PhilanthropyNORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CA…
Other$104,449Health$79,524Philanthropy$65,225

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEVADA CANCER COALITION: $72,524 over 8y, 7.5% of budgetNORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION: $65,225 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEVADA CANCER COALITION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Heath Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Heath Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2022
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Heath’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home