How much did THE HARVEY DAN KYLE & HUNTER WEINSTEIN grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of THE HARVEY DAN KYLE & HUNTER WEINSTEIN’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

childrenclimbingnaturallivescomputerjewish

2020

naturalchildrenclimbinglivescomputerjewish

2021

childrennaturalclimbinglivesjewishcomputer

2022

burndogssan diegocomputer

2023

burndogscomputer

2025

democracyburnlandslawdogs

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,500

Median grant

States reached

$385k

Total assets

Largest grants

SARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$2,500
WESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER$2,500
ACCESS FUNDS$2,250
DEMOCRACY 21 EDUCATION$2,000
ABRAHAM INITIATIVES$2,000
CORAL REEF FOUNDATION$2,000
BURN INSTITUTE$1,500
REALITY CHANGERS$1,500
CLEAN WATER FUND$1,250
ESSENTIAL PARTNERS$1,000
JEWISH FEDERATION$500
LEAVE NO TRACE FOUND$500
PUPPIES BEHIND BARS$500
HOLY APOSTLES SOUP K$500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 9%. 57% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$116k · 24 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$116k

$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%

+4%

Still filing today

46%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SF
Sarcoma Foundation of America
7× · 2019–2025 · $18k · revenue +55%
AI
ABRAHAM INITIATIVES
3× · 2023–2025 · $6k · revenue +6%
WE
WESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER
2× · 2024–2025 · $4k · revenue +73%

Funded once

GL
GRANDMA LULUS TABLE
one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +4%
AF
Acess Fund
one grant, 2019 · $2k
SC
Second Chance San Diego
one grant, 2019 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Fusion Industry Association

The Fusion Industry Association is the unified voice of the growing fusion industry. Fusion energy, when commercialized, will revolutionize the global energy system by providing a clean, safe, sustainable form of always-on energy. The…

Environment

Donor Alliance Inc

Donor Alliance saves and heals lives through organ and tissue donation and transplantation

Health

Sustainable Investments Institute Inc

The Sustainable Investments Institute conducts impartial research and publishes reports on organized efforts to influence corporate behavior on social and environmental issues.

—

Public Interest Law Initiative

PILI engages, inspires and empowers those advancing equal access to justice.

Crime & Legal

Food Security for America Inc

Creating communities across America to equip those in need of healthy fresh food

—

Arbor Research Collaborative for

To improve patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice.

Health

Mit Free Speech Alliance

To promote free expression, academic freedom, viewpoint diversity, and open scientific inquiry in the MIT community

Civil Rights

Good Work Institute Inc

To strengthen collaboration and encourage transition to regenerative systems.

Human Services

Coalition for Clean Air

To protect public health, improve air quality and prevent climate change

Environment

Global Impact Investing Network Inc

Increase the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet.

Philanthropy

Brandworkers International Inc

Brandworkers International is a non-profit organization of local food-making workers coming together for a good job and sustainable food system.

Civil Rights

Gardens for Health International

Gardens for Health International works to provide lasting agricultural solutions to chronic childhood malnutrition

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Abraham Initiatives Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hias Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

12/12

Grantees still filing

9/12

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$76,100Arts & Culture$17,500International$8,000Environment$7,000Human Services$7,000Philanthropy$6,500Education$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE HARVEY DAN KYLE & HUNTER WEINSTEIN funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GRANDMA LULUS TABLE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~5 months of operating runway; revenue held over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 844675479 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GRANDMA LULUS TABLE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Harvey Dan Kyle & Hunter Weinstein?

Find your warmest path to The Harvey Dan Kyle & Hunter Weinstein through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE HARVEY DAN KYLE & HUNTER WEINSTEIN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Harvey Dan Kyle & Hunter Weinstein?

More from the funding graph

THE HARVEY DAN KYLE & HUNTER WEINSTEIN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Harvey Dan Kyle & Hunter Weinstein?

More from the funding graph