Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Harry & Mae Schetzen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$707k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$177k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$992kScience & Tech$992kCivil Rights$650kReligion$180kHealth$171kInternational$168kPublic Safety & Disaster$165k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $106k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $601k
$106,030
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HADASSAH THE WOMENS ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA INC$176,717
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC$106,030
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC$106,030
AMERICAN ASSOCIATES BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV INC$106,030
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION-ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC$106,030
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK$35,343
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$35,343
ZAKA SEARCH AND RESCUE INC$35,343
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ZAKA SEARCH AND RESCUE INC: $130k → 10%ZAKA SEARCH AND RESCUE INC: $35k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 7 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$2.8M
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+17%

Still filing today

86%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’22’25
InternationalEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $496k · revenue +71%
  • AF
    AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $496k · revenue +34%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    2× · 2022–2025 · $165k · revenue +190%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM - ARMDI
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • SZ
    SHAARE ZEDEK JERUSALEM MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • IC
    ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
American Friends of Bar-Ilan University

We fundraise in the u.s. to support, and raise awareness of, bar-ilan university in israel.

Education
4
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
5
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
6
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
7
American Friends of the Us - Israel Binational Science Foundation

The mission of the american friends of the u.s.-israel binational science foundation (afbsf) is to ensure the continuation of collaborative world-class scientific research by israeli and american scientists through the us israel binational…

Science & Tech
8
American Friends of Menuchas Asher Csenger Inc

To promote, benefit, and support jewish educational activities in israel

Religion
9
American Friends of the Rambam Medical Center

To promote and support the rambam health care campus-the premier medical center in northern israel.

International
10
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion
11
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
12
American Friends of Mosdos Montreal Inc

To promote and enhance jewish religious observance in canada

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Hebrew University Inc; the most unlike its peers is Israel Magen Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $496,030 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY I…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $496,030 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INCAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $496,030 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INCAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $165,343 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $165,343 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMHADASSAH THE WOMENS ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA INC: $826,717 · OtherHADASSAH THE WOMENS ZIONIST …+4 more: $12,000 · OtherAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC: $496,030 · EducationAMERICANS FOR BE…Israel Magen Fund Inc: $165,343 · Human Services
International$1,818,776Other$838,717Education$496,030Human Services$165,343

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $496,030 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $496,030 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $496,030 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC: $496,030 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $165,343 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $165,343 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetIsrael Magen Fund Inc: $165,343 over 2y, 18% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Harry & Mae Schetzen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Harry & Mae Schetzen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harry & Mae Schetzen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph