Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Harold Reich Goldmann Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$322k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$481kPhilanthropy$337kCivil Rights$288kReligion$240kScience & Tech$192kFood & Nutrition$144kHealth$144kEnvironment$96k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $282k
$16,100
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF PRINCETON MERCER & BUCKS COUNTY$40,400
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$32,300
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$32,300
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$32,300
ADATH ISRAEL CONGREGATION$24,200
MAZON A JEWISH RESPONSE TO HUNGER$24,200
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$16,100
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USAINC$16,100
SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER$16,100
THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA$16,100
SIERRA CLUB$16,100
HADASSAH THE WOMEN'S ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA$16,100
YIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH$8,000
NAMI$8,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $32k → 8%SIERRA CLUB: $16k → 10%SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER: $16k → 14%UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF PRINCETON MERCER & BUCKS COUNTY: $40k → 11%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF PRINCETON MERCER & BUCKS COUNTY: $25k → 11%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF PRINCETON MERCER & BUCKS COUNTY: $25k → 11%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF PRINCETON MERCER & BUCKS COUNTY: $25k → 11%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF PRINCETON MERCER & BUCKS COUNTY: $25k → 11%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF PRINCETON MERCER & BUCKS COUNTY: $25k → 11%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF PRINCETON MERCER & BUCKS COUNTY: $25k → 11%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%MAZON A JEWISH RESPONSE TO HUNGER: $24k → 14%UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF PRINCETON MERCER & BUCKS COUNTY: $25k → 11%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF PRINCETON MERCER & BUCKS COUNTY: $25k → 11%MAZON A JEWISH RESPONSE TO HUNGER: $15k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $32k → 17%ADATH ISRAEL CONGREGATION: $24k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $20k → 17%ADATH ISRAEL CONGREGATION: $15k → 11%MAZON A JEWISH RESPONSE TO HUNGER: $15k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $20k → 17%ADATH ISRAEL CONGREGATION: $15k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $20k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $20k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $20k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $20k → 17%AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $16k → 17%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USAINC: $16k → 17%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $32k → 17%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $20k → 17%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $20k → 17%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $20k → 17%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $20k → 17%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $20k → 17%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $20k → 17%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $20k → 17%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $20k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $20k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $20k → 17%HADASSAH THE WOMEN'S ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $16k → 17%THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA: $16k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
VA
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 13 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
0

Total granted

$1.2M
$0

Still filing today

69%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalArts & CultureCivil RightsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $192k · revenue +206%
  • MA
    MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger
    9× · 2017–2025 · $144k · revenue +50%
  • SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $96k · revenue +51%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

    Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

    Arts & Culture
    2
    Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

    The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

    Arts & Culture
    3
    Yeshiva University

    The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

    Education
    4
    Us Middle East Project Inc

    The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

    International
    5
    Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

    Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

    —
    6
    The Jerusalem Connection
    —
    7
    Jewish Federation of Southern Arizona

    Jewish philanthropies of southern arizona (jpsa) is committed to achieving the full potential of jewish philanthropy, now and for future generations. comprised of jewish federation of southern arizona (jfsa or federation) and jewish…

    Philanthropy
    8
    United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc

    Uja-federation of new york (uja) cares for jews everywhere and new yorkers of all backgrounds, responds to crises close to home and far away, and shapes the jewish future. through strategic grantmaking, uja provides funding and resources…

    Philanthropy
    9
    National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
    —
    10
    Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago

    Juf provides critical resources that bring food, refuge, health care, education and emergency assistance to over 500,000 chicagoans of all faiths and millions of jews in israel and around the world, funding a network of 100+ agencies,…

    Philanthropy
    11
    Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

    Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

    Community Improvement
    12
    Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

    To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

    Education
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Jewish Committee; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    13/13
    Grantees still filing
    11/13
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    ADATH ISRAEL CONGREGATION: $144,200 · OtherADATH ISRAEL CONGREGATIONMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $144,200 · OtherMAZON A Jewish Response to HungerDOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USAINC: $96,100 · OtherDOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USAINCHADASSAH THE WOMEN'S ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $96,100 · OtherHADASSAH THE WOMEN'S ZIONIST ORGANIZATI…SIERRA CLUB: $96,100 · OtherSIERRA CLUBTHE JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY: $48,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETYAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $48,000 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $192,300 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $192,300 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MA…UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF PRINCETON MERCER BUCKS INC: $240,400 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH FEDER…THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $96,100 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATI…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $192,300 · EducationPresident a…SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $96,100 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $96,100 · Civil RightsAmerican Heart Association Inc: $48,000 · HealthNAMI National: $48,000 · HealthYIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC: $48,000 · Religion
    Other$672,700International$384,600Philanthropy$336,500Education$192,300Arts & Culture$96,100Civil Rights$96,100Health$96,000Religion$48,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF PRINCETON MERCER BUCKS INC: $240,400 over 9y, 4.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $192,300 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $192,300 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $192,300 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $144,200 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $96,100 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $96,100 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $96,100 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $96,100 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY: $48,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $48,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetYIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC: $48,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI National: $48,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF PRINCETON MERCER BUCKS INC ↗
    • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
    • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
    • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
    • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
    • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
    • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
    • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
    • Who funds THE JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY ↗
    • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
    • Who funds YIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC ↗
    • Who funds NAMI National ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization The Harold Reich Goldmann Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Harold Reich Goldmann Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
    • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Harold Reich Goldmann Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to The Harold Reich Goldmann Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Harold Reich Goldmann’s filings →

    More from the funding graph