Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Harold & Phyllis Van Horn Foundation C/O John F Kearns Atty

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$140kHealth$5k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$177k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY$5,000
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%DICKINSON COLLEGE: $5k → 8%BRYN MAWR COLLEGE: $5k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF LEHIGH: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $5k → 14%MARIST COLLEGE: $5k → 9%COLGATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%UNION COLLEGE: $5k → 12%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%ITHACA COLLEGE: $5k → 16%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $5k → 17%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $5k → 14%WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 7%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%THE COLORADO COLLEGE: $5k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $5k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $5k → 8%LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $5k → 20%VIRGINIA TECH: $5k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $5k → 22%JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 29%UNION COLLEGE: $5k → 12%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%SCHOOL OF VISUAL ARTS: $5k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
NE
VA
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$30k · 3 repeat orgs$110k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
20

Total granted

$30k
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+39%

Still filing today

67%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2018–2021 · $10k · revenue +40%
  • UC
    UNION COLLEGE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k
  • University of Chicago
    2× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE COLORADO COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +4%
  • NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +63%
  • SO
    SCHOOL OF VISUAL ARTS
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
4
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
5
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
6
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
7
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
8
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
9
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

10
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
11
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
12
Hillsdale College

Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University and the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
16/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITYUniversity of Chicago — $10,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoTHE COLORADO COLLEGE — $5,000 · EducationTHE COLORADO COLLEGENORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND — $5,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF RICHMONDNew York University — $5,000 · EducationNew York UniversityWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationWESLEYAN UNIVERSITYDICKINSON COLLEGE — $5,000 · EducationDICKINSON COLLEGEITHACA COLLEGE — $5,000 · EducationITHACA COLLEGEThe George Washington University — $5,000 · EducationThe George Washington UniversityMARIST UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationMARIST UNIVERSITYTrustees of Tufts College — $5,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts CollegeCreighton University — $5,000 · EducationCreighton UniversityLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC — $5,000 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INCCOLGATE UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationCOLGATE UNIVERSITYBRYN MAWR COLLEGE — $5,000 · EducationBRYN MAWR COLLEGEUNION COLLEGE — $10,000 · OtherUNION COLLEGESCHOOL OF VISUAL ARTS — $5,000 · OtherSCHOOL OF VISUAL ARTSUNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH — $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGHVIRGINIA TECH — $5,000 · OtherVIRGINIA TECHUNIVERSITY OF LEHIGH — $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF LEHIGHUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES — $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELESJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · OtherJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITYUniversity of Michigan — $5,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA — $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIABROWN UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · Community Improvement
Education$90,000Other$50,000Community Improvement$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDICKINSON COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetITHACA COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIST UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCOLGATE UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRYN MAWR COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Harold & Phyllis Van Horn Foundation C/O John F Kearns Atty funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Trustees of Tufts College11% of income from government
  • Northeastern University4% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Harold & Phyllis Van Horn Foundation C/O John F Kearns Atty?

Find your warmest path to The Harold & Phyllis Van Horn Foundation C/O John F Kearns Atty through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph