Skip to content
The Har-Pearl Spruill Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Har-Pearl Spruill Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$276kReligion$248kMembership Benefit$38kYouth Development$14kArts & Culture$12k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$20,000
MT OLIVE AME CHURCH$20,000
FRANKLIN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$20,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$20,000
FIRST CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY CHURCH$20,000
ANGELA BELT SUMMER ENRICHMENT PROGRAM$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 5% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ASBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $21k → 6%BOWIE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%TOWSON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%ALPHA PHI ALPHA CHAPTER: $7k → 19%UMES FOUNDATION: $8k → 22%ASBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $20k → 6%STEVENSON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%ASBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $20k → 6%ANGELA BELT SUMMER ENRICHMENT PROGRAM: $5k → 6%ANGELA BELT SUMMER ENRICHMENT PROGRAM: $5k → 6%ALPHA PHI ALPHA FRATERNITY INC: $27k → 6%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $21k → 6%FIRST CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY CHURCH: $21k → 6%MT OLIVE AME CHURCH: $21k → 6%MT OLIVE AME CHURCH: $20k → 6%FIRST CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY CHURCH: $20k → 6%MT OLIVE AME CHURCH: $20k → 6%FIRST CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY CHURCH: $20k → 6%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $20k → 6%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $20k → 6%MT OLIVE AME CHURCH: $16k → 6%FIRST CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY CHURCH: $16k → 6%FIRST CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY CHURCH: $16k → 6%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $16k → 6%MT OLIVE AME CHURCH: $16k → 6%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $16k → 6%WILEY H BATES LEGACY CENTER: $10k → 6%A TRIBUTE TO WOMEN OF COLOR MT OLIVE CDCATWOC: $7k → 6%A TRIBUTE TO WOMEN OF COLOR MT OLIVE CDCATWOC: $7k → 6%ALPHA PHI ALPHA FRATERNITY INC: $4k → 6%ALPHA PHI ALPHA FRATERNITY INC: $4k → 6%DARLENE WASHINGTON SUMMER ENRICHMEN: $8k → 6%ALPHA PHI ALPHA FRATERNITY INC: $4k → 6%DARLENE WASHINGTON SUMMER ENRICHMEN: $7k → 6%WILEY H BATES LEGACY CENTER: $2k → 6%ASBURY BROADNECK UMC: $16k → 6%DARLENE WASHINGTON SUMMER ENRICHMENT PROGRAM (SEP): $7k → 6%FIRST CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY CHURCH: $100 → 6%ASBURY BROADNECK UMC: $16k → 6%FRANKLIN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $21k → 6%FRANKLIN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $20k → 6%FRANKLIN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $20k → 6%FRANKLIN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $16k → 6%FRANKLIN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $16k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$554k · 11 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +93% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$554k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
+19%

Still filing today

18%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MT OLIVE AME CHURCH
    5× · 2018–2024 · $94k
  • FC
    FIRST CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY CHURCH
    6× · 2018–2024 · $93k
  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
    5× · 2018–2024 · $93k

Funded once

  • UF
    UMES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • AP
    ALPHA PHI ALPHA CHAPTER
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • DW
    DARLENE WASHINGTON SUMMER ENRICHMENT PROGRAM
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
3/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MT OLIVE AME CHURCH: $93,600 · OtherMT OLIVE AME CHURCHFIRST CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY CHURCH: $93,100 · OtherFIRST CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY CHURCHFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $93,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHFRANKLIN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $93,000 · OtherFRANKLIN UNITED METHODIST CHURCHASBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $61,000 · OtherASBURY UNITED METHODIST CHURCHALPHA PHI ALPHA FRATERNITY INC: $38,210 · OtherALPHA PHI ALPHA FRATERNITY INCIndividual grant recipient: $32,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+8 more: $68,813 · Other+8 moreWILEY H BATES LEGACY CENTER INC: $12,000 · Arts & CultureSTEVENSON UNIVERSITY: $3,500 · Education
Other$572,723Arts & Culture$12,000Education$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALPHA PHI ALPHA FRATERNITY INC: $38,210 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWILEY H BATES LEGACY CENTER INC: $12,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetSTEVENSON UNIVERSITY: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALPHA PHI ALPHA FRATERNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds WILEY H BATES LEGACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds STEVENSON UNIVERSITY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Har-Pearl Spruill Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Har-Pearl Spruill Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Stevenson University: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Har-Pearl Spruill Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Har-Pearl Spruill Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Har-Pearl Spruill’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home