Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Haddad Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$161kPublic Benefit$151kArts & Culture$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kHealth$24kHuman Services$13kCivil Rights$5kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$4,151
Median grant
1
States reached
$575k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$20,000
THE CLAY CENTER$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
MARSHALL UNIVERSITY$4,151
WV KIDS CANCER CRUSADERS$1,000
FAMILY HEALTH CARE$1,000
BUCKSKIN COUNCIL$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 54% of The Haddad Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in WV; by stated purpose, 28%.

The Haddad Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$240k · 8 repeat orgs$212k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
14

Total granted

$240k
$210k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
-3%

Still filing today

38%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $81k · revenue +5%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    6× · 2018–2024 · $35k · revenue +9%
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SO WV INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • SH
    SPRING HILL CEMETERY PARK COMM
    one grant, 2018 · $150k
  • LF
    LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF KANAWHA COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -92%
  • AU
    ANDERSON UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +88%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center

Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
2
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine

The mission of the edward via college of osteopathic medicine (vcom) is to prepare globally-minded, community-focused physicians to meet the needs of rural and medically underserved populations and promote research to improve human health.

Education
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
7
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) is one of the nation's longest serving and most prestigious academic medical centers. Through its historic bond with Vanderbilt University, VUMC cultivates distinguished research and educational…

Health
8
Washington Regional Medical Center

Washington regional is committed to improving the health of people in communities we serve through compassionate, high-quality care, prevention, and wellness education.

Health
9
Benedictine College

Benedictine college's mission as a catholic, benedictine, liberal arts, residential college is the education of men and women within a community of faith & scholarship.

Education
10
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
11
West Virginia University Hospitals Inc

WVU Hospitals WVUH exists to provide a quality healthcare system, including tertiary services, to the citizens of WV and the surrounding region. Equally important, WVUH is committed by law and philosophy to be the primary clinical site for…

Health
12
Blanchard Valley Regional Health Center

Our mission: our extraordinary people provide caring for a lifetime through a broad continuum of exceptional health-related services in northwest ohio.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Anderson University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SPRING HILL CEMETERY PARK COMM: $150,000 · OtherSPRING HILL CEMETERY PARK COMMTHE CLAY CENTER: $50,000 · OtherTHE CLAY CENTERMARSHALL UNIVERSITY: $46,898 · OtherMARSHALL UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · Other+14 more: $51,369 · Other+14 moreWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $80,500 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSI…ANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationANDERSON UNIVERSITYAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $35,000 · Human ServicesLIBRARY FOUNDATION OF KANAWHA COUNTY INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SO WV INC: $2,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 · Health
Other$313,267Education$90,500Human Services$35,000Philanthropy$10,000Health$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $80,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLIBRARY FOUNDATION OF KANAWHA COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOur Lady of Bellefonte Hospital Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN MISSION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SO WV INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF KANAWHA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ANDERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Our Lady of Bellefonte Hospital Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SO WV INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Haddad Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Haddad Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Haddad’s filings →

    More from the funding graph