Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gunzenhauser Chapin Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$1.5MInternational$1.4MEnvironment$996kAnimals$829kArts & Culture$724kHuman Services$521kRecreation & Sports$512kYouth Development$492kOther$0
02FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $537k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $635k
$30,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN CHILDHOOD CANCER ORGANIZATION$120,000
SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL$90,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$90,000
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS$60,000
WESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER$60,000
INTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS$60,000
Individual grant recipient$55,000
NORTH BAY CNA$50,000
SOUNDXPERIENCE$50,000
SUPER HEROES HUMANE SOCIETY$40,000
LITTLE VILLAGE FOUNDATION$40,000
GROTON HILL MUSIC$40,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC$36,500
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$35,000
DG EDUCATIONAL SERVICES$35,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $439k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $46k → 9%AL OTRO LADO INC: $25k → 14%SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $44k → 9%AL OTRO LADO INC: $24k → 14%Shared Hope International: $20k → 9%LAURA S HOUSE: $2k → 10%AL OTRO LADO INC: $23k → 14%SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $14k → 9%AL OTRO LADO INC: $20k → 14%RICHARD DE LONE SPECIAL HOUSING PROJECT: $38k → 8%HOPELINK: $46k → 9%HOPELINK: $44k → 9%RICHARD DE LONE SPECIAL HOUSING PROJECT: $30k → 8%Hopelink: $20k → 9%HOPELINK: $14k → 9%Richard De Lone Special Housing Pro: $30k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MT
IL
NY
MA
OR
SD
PA
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
HI
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.1M · 59 repeat orgs$936k to everyone else

59 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

59
39

Total granted

$8.1M
$793k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+57%

Still filing today

86%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $143k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentArts & CultureInternationalAnimalsEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AMERICAN CHILDHOOD CANCER ORGANIZAT
    8× · 2017–2024 · $845k · revenue +46%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $539k · revenue +50%
  • GP
    Global Pediatric Alliance
    8× · 2017–2024 · $368k · revenue +174% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

  • MAUI FOOD BANK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $112k · revenue +138%
  • GH
    GLEN HIGHLAND FARM INC
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -9%
  • MH
    MALAMA HULEIAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $80k · revenue ×22

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
4
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
5
California Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance

California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.

Environment
6
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
7
Amazon Watch Inc

To protect the rainforest and advance the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with Indigenous communities in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability, and the preservation of the Amazon Basin's…

Environment
8
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
9
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
10
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
11
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
12
International Rivers Network

International Rivers protects rivers and defends the rights of communities that depend on them.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Groton Hill Music Inc and the most unlike its peers is North Bay Cna. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPregnancy Support ServicesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Animal Rescue and ShelterFood Banks and PantriesImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyFaith-Based Social ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesLgbtq+ Community SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Community FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%36%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%36%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%10%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%3/95
the rest of the field
13%
240,393/1,819,470

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

90 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 90 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
88/90
Grantees still filing
72/90
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN CHILDHOOD CANCER ORGANIZAT — $845,000 · OtherAMERICAN CHILDHOOD CANCER ORGANIZATIndividual grant recipient — $355,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSUSAN HOWARD'S NOVATO BOXING CLUB — $270,000 · OtherBUILDING A GLOBAL COMMUNITY — $260,250 · OtherWESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $260,000 · OtherCHILDHAVEN — $207,642 · OtherDG Educational Services — $348,000 · OtherDG Educational ServicesSOUTH WHIDBEY GOOD CHEER — $230,000 · Other+51 more — $2,510,217 · Other+51 moreGlobal Pediatric Alliance — $367,733 · Arts & CultureGlobal Pedi…Little Village Foundation — $244,000 · Arts & CultureLittle Vill…GROTON HILL MUSIC INC — $170,000 · Arts & CultureGROTON HILL…NORTHWEST FILM FORUM — $73,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHWEST F…+7 more — $63,000 · Arts & Culture+7 moreSHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL — $297,643 · Human ServicesSHARED HO…Prader-Willi Homes of California — $286,000 · Human ServicesPrader-Wi…HOPELINK — $123,641 · Human ServicesHOPELINKAL OTRO LADO — $92,000 · Human ServicesAL OTRO L…+1 more — $1,500 · Human ServicesWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $274,300 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $156,933 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS — $70,000 · InternationalCENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL POLICY INC — $65,000 · InternationalMADRE INC — $40,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $33,391 · InternationalANGEL-STRONG LLC — $30,000 · International+2 more — $9,000 · InternationalTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $205,000 · AnimalsSUPER HEROES IN RIPPED JEANS INC — $171,000 · AnimalsWINGS OF RESCUE INC — $92,000 · AnimalsPREDATOR DEFENSE — $91,300 · AnimalsKauai SPCA — $35,000 · Animals+1 more — $5,000 · AnimalsPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $539,450 · HealthMALAMA PONO HEALTH SERVICES FKA MALAMA PONO-KAUAI AIDS PROJECT — $22,250 · Health+3 more — $30,000 · HealthWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC — $154,000 · EnvironmentINLAND NORTHWEST LAND TRUST — $87,000 · EnvironmentTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION — $56,300 · EnvironmentSPOKANE RIVERKEEPER — $56,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC — $45,000 · EnvironmentMARINE RESOURCES COUNCIL OF EAST FLORIDA INC — $32,000 · EnvironmentPUGET SOUNDKEEPER ALLIANCE — $25,000 · EnvironmentSnake River Waterkeeper Inc — $23,000 · EnvironmentRIVERKEEPER INC — $18,000 · Environment+4 more — $39,500 · Environment
Other$5,286,109Arts & Culture$917,733Human Services$800,784International$678,624Animals$599,300Health$591,700Environment$535,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN CHILDHOOD CANCER ORGANIZAT — $845,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $539,450 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGlobal Pediatric Alliance — $367,733 over 8y, 30% of budgetDG Educational Services — $348,000 over 8y, 84% of budgetSHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL — $297,643 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetPrader-Willi Homes of California — $286,000 over 8y, 42% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $274,300 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSUSAN HOWARD'S NOVATO BOXING CLUB — $270,000 over 8y, 49% of budgetBUILDING A GLOBAL COMMUNITY — $260,250 over 7y, 56% of budgetWESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $260,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetLittle Village Foundation — $244,000 over 5y, 20% of budgetSOUTH WHIDBEY GOOD CHEER — $230,000 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetCHILDHAVEN — $207,642 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $205,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKauai Sailing Association — $172,000 over 6y, 28% of budgetSUPER HEROES IN RIPPED JEANS INC — $171,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSISSIPPI — $170,250 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetGROTON HILL MUSIC INC — $170,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $167,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $161,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $156,933 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC — $154,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSound Experience — $123,643 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetHOPELINK — $123,641 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $111,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE OVERLAKE SCHOOL — $105,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGLEN HIGHLAND FARM INC — $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY — $95,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetWINGS OF RESCUE INC — $92,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetAL OTRO LADO — $92,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetPREDATOR DEFENSE — $91,300 over 7y, 14% of budgetINLAND NORTHWEST LAND TRUST — $87,000 over 7y, 8.0% of budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $78,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST FILM FORUM — $73,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetSCHWEITZER ALPINE RACING SCHOOL — $70,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS — $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL POLICY INC — $65,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL LAW ALLIANCE WORLDWIDE — $60,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION — $56,300 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSPOKANE RIVERKEEPER — $56,000 over 5y, 8.0% of budgetNorth Bay CNA — $50,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetThe Body Positive — $45,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC — $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMADRE INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILYWORKS — $33,392 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSolid Ground Washington — $33,392 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $33,391 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE RESOURCES COUNCIL OF EAST FLORIDA INC — $32,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN CHILDHOOD CANCER ORGANIZAT ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Global Pediatric Alliance ↗
  • Who funds DG Educational Services ↗
  • Who funds SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Prader-Willi Homes of California ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SUSAN HOWARD'S NOVATO BOXING CLUB ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING A GLOBAL COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Little Village Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH WHIDBEY GOOD CHEER ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHAVEN ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Kauai Sailing Association ↗
  • Who funds SUPER HEROES IN RIPPED JEANS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSISSIPPI ↗
  • Who funds GROTON HILL MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Sound Experience ↗
  • Who funds HOPELINK ↗
  • Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OVERLAKE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds GLEN HIGHLAND FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY ↗
  • Who funds WINGS OF RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds AL OTRO LADO ↗
  • Who funds PREDATOR DEFENSE ↗
  • Who funds INLAND NORTHWEST LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds MALAMA HULEIA ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST FILM FORUM ↗
  • Who funds SCHWEITZER ALPINE RACING SCHOOL ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lynn R & Karl E Prick…Seattle FoundationThe Burning FoundationPatagoniaorgMcKinstry Charitable …New Priorities Founda…The Northwest Fund fo…Foundation to Promote…Puget Sound Energy Fo…The David and Lucile …The San Francisco Fou…Innovia Foundation
Lynn R & Karl E Prickett FundNC74.8× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lynn R & Karl E Prickett Fund · Seattle Foundation · The Burning Foundation · Patagoniaorg · McKinstry Charitable Foundation · New Priorities Foundation co Third Plateau · The Northwest Fund for the Environment · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Innovia Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gunzenhauser Chapin Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Groton Hill Music Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gunzenhauser Chapin Fund?

Find your warmest path to Gunzenhauser Chapin Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 108 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines